Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441567›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

Non-mammalian models in behavioral neuroscience: consequences for biological psychiatry.

Caio Maximino, Rhayra Xavier do Carmo Silva, Suéllen de Nazaré Santos da Silva, Laís do Socorro Dos Santos Rodrigues, Hellen Barbosa, Tayana Silva de Carvalho, Luana Ketlen Dos Reis Leão, Monica Gomes Lima, Karen Renata Matos Oliveira, Anderson Manoel Herculano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Aging and the clock: Perspective from flies to humans.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Boldness in Male and Female Zebrafish (Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Parkinson's disease pathogenesis from the viewpoint of small fish models.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caio MaximinoLaboratório de Neurociências e Comportamento, Departamento de Morfologia e Ciências Fisiológicas, Campus VIII - Marabá, Universidade do Estado do Pará Marabá, Brazil.
Rhayra Xavier do Carmo SilvaLaboratório de Neurociências e Comportamento, Departamento de Morfologia e Ciências Fisiológicas, Campus VIII - Marabá, Universidade do Estado do Pará Marabá, Brazil.
Suéllen de Nazaré Santos da SilvaLaboratório de Neurociências e Comportamento, Departamento de Morfologia e Ciências Fisiológicas, Campus VIII - Marabá, Universidade do Estado do Pará Marabá, Brazil.
Laís do Socorro Dos Santos RodriguesLaboratório de Neurociências e Comportamento, Departamento de Morfologia e Ciências Fisiológicas, Campus VIII - Marabá, Universidade do Estado do Pará Marabá, Brazil.
Hellen BarbosaLaboratório de Neurociências e Comportamento, Departamento de Morfologia e Ciências Fisiológicas, Campus VIII - Marabá, Universidade do Estado do Pará Marabá, Brazil.
Tayana Silva de CarvalhoUniversität Duisburg-Essen Essen, Germany ; Laboratório de Neurofarmacologia Experimental, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará Belém, Brazil.
Luana Ketlen Dos Reis LeãoLaboratório de Neurofarmacologia Experimental, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará Belém, Brazil.
Monica Gomes LimaLaboratório de Neurociências e Comportamento, Departamento de Morfologia e Ciências Fisiológicas, Campus VIII - Marabá, Universidade do Estado do Pará Marabá, Brazil ; Laboratório de Neurofarmacologia Experimental, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará Belém, Brazil.
Karen Renata Matos OliveiraLaboratório de Neurofarmacologia Experimental, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará Belém, Brazil.
Anderson Manoel HerculanoLaboratório de Neurofarmacologia Experimental, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará Belém, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current models in biological psychiatry focus on a handful of model species, and the majority of work relies on data generated in rodents. However, in the same sense that a comparative approach to neuroanatomy allows for the identification of patterns of brain organization, the inclusion of other species and an adoption of comparative viewpoints in behavioral neuroscience could also lead to increases in knowledge relevant to biological psychiatry. Specifically, this approach could help to identify conserved features of brain structure and behavior, as well as to understand how variation in gene expression or developmental trajectories relates to variation in brain and behavior pertinent to psychiatric disorders. To achieve this goal, the current focus on mammalian species must be expanded to include other species, including non-mammalian taxa. In this article, we review behavioral neuroscientific experiments in non-mammalian species, including traditional "model organisms" (zebrafish and Drosophila) as well as in other species which can be used as "reference." The application of these domains in biological psychiatry and their translational relevance is considered.

Indexed as

anamniotesbehavioral modelsbiological psychiatryinvertebratessauropsidateleost fish

Identifiers

PMID26441567
PMCPMC4561806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.