Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441566›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

Building an adaptive brain across development: targets for neurorehabilitation must begin in infancy.

Jamie O Edgin, Caron A C Clark, Esha Massand, Annette Karmiloff-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toward children's cognitive development from the perspective of neurolaw: implications ofPsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Adaptive behavior in infants and toddlers with Down syndrome and fragile X syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2018
    Article
  11. Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Down Syndrome.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down Syndrome: Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jamie O EdginDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA ; Sonoran University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Tucson, AZ, USA.
Caron A C ClarkDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA.
Esha MassandCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London London, UK.
Annette Karmiloff-SmithCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London London, UK.
Birkbeck, University of London · GBUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much progress has been made toward behavioral and pharmacological intervention in intellectual disability, which was once thought too difficult to treat. Down syndrome (DS) research has shown rapid advances, and clinical trials are currently underway, with more on the horizon. Here, we review the literature on the emergent profile of cognitive development in DS, emphasizing that treatment approaches must consider how some "end state" impairments, such as language deficits, may develop from early alterations in neural systems beginning in infancy. Specifically, we highlight evidence suggesting that there are pre- and early postnatal alterations in brain structure and function in DS, resulting in disturbed network function across development. We stress that these early alterations are likely amplified by Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression and poor sleep. Focusing on three network hubs (prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum), we discuss how these regions may relate to evolving deficits in cognitive function in individuals with DS, and to their language profile in particular.

Indexed as

brain developmentcerebellumconnectivityDown syndromehippocampuslanguagerehabilitationtreatment

Identifiers

PMID26441566
PMCPMC4565977
OpenAlexW1871802283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.