Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26441030›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2016

Competitive SWIFT cluster templates enhance detection of aging changes.

Jonathan A Rebhahn, David R Roumanes, Yilin Qi, Atif Khan, Juilee Thakar, Alex Rosenberg, F Eun-Hyung Lee, Sally A Quataert, Gaurav Sharma, Tim R Mosmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data-Driven Flow Cytometry Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonathan A RebhahnDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
David R RoumanesDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Yilin QiDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Atif KhanDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Juilee ThakarDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Alex RosenbergDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester.
F Eun-Hyung LeeDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sally A QuataertDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Gaurav SharmaDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Tim R MosmannDavid H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Funding

Human Immunology Center at the University of RochesterR24AI054953 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOSMANN, TIM R. · 2003 to 2012
$8.8M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700008CNIAID NIH HHS R24 AI054953NIAID NIH HHS R24AI054953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustering-based algorithms for automated analysis of flow cytometry datasets have achieved more efficient and objective analysis than manual processing. Clustering organizes flow cytometry data into subpopulations with substantially homogenous characteristics but does not directly address the important problem of identifying the salient differences in subpopulations between subjects and groups. Here, we address this problem by augmenting SWIFT--a mixture model based clustering algorithm reported previously. First, we show that SWIFT clustering using a "template" mixture model, in which all subpopulations are represented, identifies small differences in cell numbers per subpopulation between samples. Second, we demonstrate that resolution of inter-sample differences is increased by "competition" wherein a joint model is formed by combining the mixture model templates obtained from different groups. In the joint model, clusters from individual groups compete for the assignment of cells, sharpening differences between samples, particularly differences representing subpopulation shifts that are masked under clustering with a single template model. The benefit of competition was demonstrated first with a semisynthetic dataset obtained by deliberately shifting a known subpopulation within an actual flow cytometry sample. Single templates correctly identified changes in the number of cells in the subpopulation, but only the competition method detected small changes in median fluorescence. In further validation studies, competition identified a larger number of significantly altered subpopulations between young and elderly subjects. This enrichment was specific, because competition between templates from consensus male and female samples did not improve the detection of age-related differences. Several changes between the young and elderly identified by SWIFT template competition were consistent with known alterations in the elderly, and additional altered subpopulations were also identified. Alternative algorithms detected far fewer significantly altered clusters. Thus SWIFT template competition is a powerful approach to sharpen comparisons between selected groups in flow cytometry datasets.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAlgorithmsBiomarkersCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunophenotypingLeukocytes, MononuclearMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersautomated analysiscompetitive clusteringEM algorithmflow cytometryimmunophenotypingsample comparisonSWIFTtemplate

Identifiers

PMID26441030
PMCPMC4737406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.