Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26440913›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Comparative analysis of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine strains and G8 rotaviruses identified during vaccine trial in Africa.

Elisabeth Heylen, Mark Zeller, Max Ciarlet, Jody Lawrence, Duncan Steele, Marc Van Ranst, Jelle Matthijnssens

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabeth HeylenKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Mark ZellerKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Max CiarletVaccines-Clinical Research Department, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA 19454, United States of America.
Jody LawrenceVaccines-Clinical Research Department, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA 19454, United States of America.
Duncan SteelePATH, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Marc Van RanstKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Jelle MatthijnssensKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USRega Institute for Medical Research · BEProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RotaTeqTM is a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine based on a bovine rotavirus genetic backbone in vitro reassorted with human outer capsid genes. During clinical trials of RotaTeqTM in Sub-Saharan Africa, the vaccine efficacy over a 2-year follow-up was lower against the genotypes contained in the vaccine than against the heterotypic G8P[6] and G8P[1] rotavirus strains of which the former is highly prevalent in Africa. Complete genome analyses of 43 complete rotavirus genomes collected during phase III clinical trials of RotaTeqTM in Sub-Saharan Africa, were conducted to gain insight into the high level of cross-protection afforded by RotaTeqTM against these G8 strains. Phylogenetic analysis revealed the presence of a high number of bovine rotavirus gene segments in these human G8 strains. In addition, we performed an in depth analysis on the individual amino acid level which showed that G8 rotaviruses were more similar to the RotaTeqTM vaccine than non-G8 strains. Because RotaTeqTM possesses a bovine genetic backbone, the high vaccine efficacy against G8 strains might be partially explained by the fact that all these strains contain a complete or partial bovine-like backbone. Altogether, this study supports the hypothesis that gene segments other than VP7 and VP4 play a role in vaccine-induced immunity.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAntigens, ViralCattleClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesViral Nonstructural ProteinsAntigens, ViralRotavirus VaccinesViral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26440913
PMCPMC4594120
OpenAlexW2416280116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.