Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26440803›Full record

GuidelinePLoS medicine2015

The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.

Eric I Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann, Katie Harron, David Moher, Irene Petersen, Henrik T Sørensen, Erik von Elm, Sinéad M Langan, RECORD Working Committee

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in PLoS medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3,096 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3,096citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03499080 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Medication Free Treatment: Characteristics, Justification and Outcome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2018 to 2023Enrolled183ConditionsMental IllnessArmsMedication free treatment, Treatment as usual Myrvegen, Treatment as usual Åråsen
NCT05932823 completednot on this map

Airflow and Hip Prosthesis Infections: A Registry Study Comparing Laminar vs. Turbulent Flow in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergRan2010 to 2021Enrolled110,000ConditionsHip Prosthesis InfectionArmsLaminary airflow
NCT06325800 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Vascular Phenotyping and Target-Organ Damage Using Vascular Imaging, Glyco-Oxidative Biomarkers, and Photoplethysmography in Adults at Increased Cardiovascular Risk: The GlycOxiTOD Observational Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de SantiagoRan2024 to 2035Enrolled1,000ConditionsHypertension, Target Organ Damage, Heart Disease Risk Factors, Vascular StiffnessArmsMultimodal Cardiovascular Phenotyping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3,096 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ozonated water mouthrinse for radiation-induced oral mucositis in non-keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Seasonal variation in day-to-day blood pressure variability: large-scale within-individual home blood pressure data.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article

3,036 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eric I BenchimolChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Liam SmeethLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Astrid GuttmannInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Katie HarronLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
David MoherOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada, and School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Irene PetersenDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Henrik T SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Erik von ElmCochrane Switzerland, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sinéad M LanganLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
RECORD Working Committee

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16895CIHR 130512Department of Health NIHR/CS/010/014Medical Research Council MR/J00488X/1Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Swiss National Science Foundation 147388Wellcome Trust 098504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchObservational Studies as TopicResearch ReportRoutinely Collected Health DataChecklistGuidelines as TopicResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26440803
PMCPMC4595218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.