SynthesisPloS one2015
A Systematic Review of Patients' Experiences in Communicating with Primary Care Physicians: Intercultural Encounters and a Balance between Vulnerability and Integrity.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exploring Communication Dynamics Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of heart rate variability biofeedback on functional gastrointestinal disorders: a scoping review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of whether the number of linguistic errors in medical interpretation is associated with the use of professional vs ad hoc interpreters.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Pooled it
- Perspectives of young people who access support for mental health in primary care: a systematic review of their experiences and needs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Pooled it
- Cocreating a Digital Patient Preparedness Tool for International Students Accessing Primary Care in Germany: A Convergent Methods Study Within the Health CASCADE Network.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II Screening, Diagnosis, and Management: A Literature Review and Practical Recommendations for Newborn Screening Programs and Health Care Providers to Support Families and Improve Outcomes.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Trust Barriers and Vulnerabilities in Older Adults' Telemedicine Adoption: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Patient-clinician communication and cardiovascular outcomes: An analysis of the hispanic community health study/study of latinos (HCHS/SOL), 2008-2019.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Association between resident physicians from foreign medical schools and general medicine in-training examination scores: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Potential increase of the U.S. total fertility rate resulting from restorative treatment of unresolved subfertility: a simulation study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Chinese people's experience of cancer in the UK: a reflexive thematic analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Acceptability of breast cancer risk assessment for women aged 30-49: Views of women from six under-served groups.PloS one · 2026Article
- Navigating the Spanish Healthcare System: Perspectives of Newcomers and Cultural Mediators on Communication, Relationships, and Fear of Deportation.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Qualitative phenomenological exploration of lived experiences and perspectives of Chinese hospital administrators engaged in medical dispute management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Consultation time and communication patterns in outpatient care: an observational study in South Korea.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Training healthcare workers and untrained interpreters in remote collaboration amidst COVID-19.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Training and usage of language interpretation services among health care providers in a large Canadian pediatric centre.Paediatrics & child health · 2025Article
- The effect of clinician-expressed empathy and nocebo-alleviating information on breast-cancer-patients' anxiety and side effects during active chemotherapy: A clinical feasibility study.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Patient-reported functional outcomes and treatment-related regret in Hispanic and Spanish-speaking men following prostate cancer treatment.Urologic oncology · 2025Article
- The WEIRD Trio: The Cultural Gap between Physicians, Learners, and Patients in Pluralistic Societies.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2025Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communication difficulties persist between patients and physicians. In order to improve care, patients' experiences of this communication must be understood. The main objective of this study is to synthesize qualitative studies exploring patients' experiences in communicating with a primary care physician. A secondary objective is to explore specific factors pertaining to ethnic minority or majority patients and their influence on patients' experiences of communication. Pertinent health and social sciences electronic databases were searched systematically (PubMed, Cinahl, PsychNet, and IBSS). Fifty-seven articles were included in the review on the basis of being qualitative studies targeting patients' experiences of communication with a primary care physician. The meta-ethnography method for qualitative studies was used to interpret data and the COREQ checklist was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Three concepts emerged from analyses: negative experiences, positive experiences, and outcomes of communication. Negative experiences related to being treated with disrespect, experiencing pressure due to time constraints, and feeling helpless due to the dominance of biomedical culture in the medical encounter. Positive experiences are attributed to certain relational skills, technical skills, as well as certain approaches to care privileged by the physician. Outcomes of communication depend on patients' evaluation of the consultation. Four categories of specific factors exerted mainly a negative influence on consultations for ethnic minorities: language barriers, discrimination, differing values, and acculturation. Ethnic majorities also raised specific factors influencing their experience: differing values and discrimination. Findings of this review are limited by the fact that more than half of the studies did not explore cultural aspects relating to this experience. Future research should address these aspects in more detail. In conclusion, all patients seemed to face additional cultural challenges. Findings provide a foundation for the development of tailored interventions to patients' preferences, thus ensuring more satisfactory experiences. Health care providers should be sensitive to specific factors (cultural and micro-cultural) during all medical encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.