ReviewDer Nervenarzt2015
[Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke : current evidence and open questions].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the importance of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of ischemic stroke. MATERIAL AND
methodsAnalysis and comparison of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MT versus i.v. thrombolysis (IVT) considering pathophysiological and logistic aspects.
resultsThe use of MT is more effective than IVT for internal carotid artery terminus (ICAT), M1 segment and tandem occlusions, i.e. proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion or stenosis, even in patients older than 75-80 years of age. Due to the small sample sizes this question cannot be answered for patients with M2 occlusions. It is still uncertain whether MT is needed in patients with a low National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score, whether IVT is needed before MT and what type of imaging should be performed. Approximately one third of eligible patients currently undergo MT in Germany. Results from RCTs with stent retrievers for patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusions are lacking.
conclusionAfter becoming established as a first-line therapy for patients with ICAT, M1 segment and tandem occlusions, the effectiveness of MT with stent retrievers has to proven in patients with more distal occlusions, low NIHSS scores and even vertebrobasilar artery occlusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26440630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.