Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26440521›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2015

[Transcranial alternating current stimulation. Entrainment and function control of neuronal networks].

J Vosskuhl, D Strüber, C S Herrmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J VosskuhlDepartment für Psychologie, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Exzellenzcluster "Hearing4all", European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
D StrüberDepartment für Psychologie, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Exzellenzcluster "Hearing4all", European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
C S HerrmannDepartment für Psychologie, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Exzellenzcluster "Hearing4all", European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland. christoph.herrmann@uni-oldenburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a new technique for the modulation of oscillatory brain activity as measured in the electroencephalogram (EEG). In contrast to well-established stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, tACS applies a sinusoidal alternating current at a specific frequency. This enables the modulation of the amplitude and frequency of endogenous brain oscillations as well as related cognitive processes. Therefore, the use of tACS has the possibility to evaluate well-known correlations between brain oscillations and cognitive processes in terms of causality. Such causal relationships have been documented in numerous neurocognitive studies on sensory, motor and perceptual processes; however, the clinical application of tACS is still in its infancy. In principle, any pathology that can reliably be connected with brain oscillations of a defined frequency is treatable. A current main focus of clinical research is on symptoms of Parkinson's disease and to a lesser degree, tinnitus. For an effective application of tACS it is important to choose the electrode positions as well as the frequency, intensity and duration of the stimulation in a theory-based and symptom-related manner. A successful therapeutic intervention requires the persistence of the tACS effect after stimulation has ceased. A mechanism that offers not only an explanation to the origin of persistent tACS effects but is also of high therapeutic benefit is neural plasticity. Therefore, one current focus of research aims at a better understanding of tACS after effects.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainHumansNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityParkinson DiseaseTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment OutcomeBrain oscillationsCognitive processesParkinson’s diseaseTinnitusTranscranial brain stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.