Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26440380›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Chemical recognition of fruit ripeness in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi).

Omer Nevo, Rosa Orts Garri, Laura Teresa Hernandez Salazar, Stefan Schulz, Eckhard W Heymann, Manfred Ayasse, Matthias Laska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TheFEMS microbes · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human odour thresholds are tuned to atmospheric chemical lifetimes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Olfactory sensitivity for mold-associated odorants in CD-1 mice and spider monkeys.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current Challenges in Plant Eco-Metabolomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Omer NevoBehavioral Ecology &Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Rosa Orts GarriIFM Biology, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Laura Teresa Hernandez SalazarInstitute of Neuroethology, University of Veracruzana, Calle y No. Dr. Luis Castelazo s/n, Col. Industrial Animas, C.P. 91190, Ciudad, Xalapa, Ver., México.
Stefan SchulzInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Technical University of Braunschweig, Hagenring 30, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
Eckhard W HeymannBehavioral Ecology &Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Manfred AyasseInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Helmhotztr. 10-1, Containerdorf, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Matthias LaskaIFM Biology, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden.
German Primate Center · DELinköping University · SEHelmholtz-Institute Ulm · DETechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates are now known to possess well-developed olfactory sensitivity and discrimination capacities that can play a substantial role in many aspects of their interaction with conspecifics and the environment. Several studies have demonstrated that olfactory cues may be useful in fruit selection. Here, using a conditioning paradigm, we show that captive spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) display high olfactory discrimination performance between synthetic odor mixtures mimicking ripe and unripe fruits of two wild, primate-consumed, Neotropical plant species. Further, we show that spider monkeys are able to discriminate the odor of ripe fruits from odors that simulate unripe fruits that become increasingly similar to that of ripe ones. These results suggest that the ability of spider monkeys to identify ripe fruits may not depend on the presence of any individual compound that mark fruit ripeness. Further, the results demonstrate that spider monkeys are able to identify ripe fruits even when the odor signal is accompanied by a substantial degree of noise.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalFruitOdorantsAnimalsAtelinaeFemaleMaleSensory ThresholdsSmellStimulation, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID26440380
PMCPMC4594300
OpenAlexW2406865179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.