ArticleDevelopmental neuroscience2015
Stereotaxic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Atlases for Infants from 3 to 12 Months.
Article in Developmental neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Development of Lateralized Brain Oscillations in Infants: Lessons From Autism.Developmental psychobiology · 2025Article
- Exploring the cortical involvement in sensorimotor integration during early stages of independent walking.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Prosodic cues enhance infants' sensitivity to nonadjacent regularities.Science advances · 2023Article
- Frontal asymmetry assessed in infancy using functional near-infrared spectroscopy is associated with emotional and behavioral problems in early childhood.Child development · 2023Article
- Article
- Cortical Source Analysis of the Face Sensitive N290 ERP Component in Infants at High Risk for Autism.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Evaluating Head Models for Cortical Source Localization of the Face-Sensitive N290 Component in Infants.Brain topography · 2022Article
- Age-related changes in diffuse optical tomography sensitivity profiles from childhood to adulthood.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Cortical Source Analysis of Event-Related Potentials: A Developmental Approach.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Influence of the Head Model Conductor on the Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Potentials.Brain topography · 2021Article
- Infants differentially extract rules from language.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- devfOLD: a toolbox for designing age-specific fNIRS channel placement.Neurophotonics · 2021Article
- Investigating developmental changes in scalp-to-cortex correspondence using diffuse optical tomography sensitivity in infancy.Neurophotonics · 2021Article
- Structural templates for imaging EEG cortical sources in infants.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Article
- The functional brain networks that underlie visual working memory in the first two years of life.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- White matter extension of the Melbourne Children's Regional Infant Brain atlas: M-CRIB-WM.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Face-sensitive brain responses in the first year of life.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to assess social information processing in poor urban Bangladeshi infants and toddlers.Developmental science · 2019Article
- The neural sources of N170: Understanding timing of activation in face-selective areas.Psychophysiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate labeling of brain structures within an individual or group is a key issue in neuroimaging. Methods for labeling infant brains have depended on the labels done on adult brains or average magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) templates based on adult brains. However, the features of adult brains differ in several ways from infant brains, so the creation of a labeled stereotaxic atlas based on infants would be helpful. The current work builds on the recent creation of age-appropriate average MRI templates during the first year (3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, and 12 months) by creating anatomical label sets for each template.
methodsWe created stereotaxic atlases for the age-specific average MRI templates. Manual delineation of cortical and subcortical areas was done on the average templates based on infants during the first year. We also applied a procedure for automatic computation of macroanatomical atlases for individual infant participants using two manually segmented adult atlases (Hammers, LONI Probabilistic Brain Atlas-LPBA40). To evaluate our methods, we did manual delineation of several cortical areas on selected individuals from each age. Linear and nonlinear registration of the individual and average template was used to transform the average atlas into the individual participant's space, and the average-transformed atlas was compared to the individual manually delineated brain areas. We also applied these methods to an external data set - not used in the atlas creation - to test generalizability of the atlases.
resultsAge-appropriate manual atlases were the best fit to the individual manually delineated regions, with more error seen at greater age discrepancy. There was a close fit between the manually delineated and the automatically labeled regions for individual participants and for the age-appropriate template-based atlas transformed into participant space. There was close correspondence between automatic labeling of individual brain regions and those from the age-appropriate template. These relationships held even when tested on an external set of images.
conclusionWe have created age-appropriate labeled templates for use in the study of infant development at 6 ages (3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, and 12 months). Comparison with manual methods was quite good. We developed three stereotaxic atlases (one manual, two automatic) for each infant age, which should allow more fine-grained analysis of brain structure for these populations than was previously possible with existing tools. The template-based atlases constructed in the current study are available online (http://jerlab.psych.sc.edu/NeurodevelopmentalMRIDatabase).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.