Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26440296›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental neuroscience2015

Stereotaxic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Atlases for Infants from 3 to 12 Months.

Paul T Fillmore, John E Richards, Michelle C Phillips-Meek, Alison Cryer, Michael Stevens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul T FillmoreDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C., USA.
John E Richards
Michelle C Phillips-Meek
Alison Cryer
Michael Stevens
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

The Development of Sustained Attention in InfantsR37HD018942 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RICHARDS, JOHN E · 2007 to 2016
$4.5M
The development of sustained attention in infantsR01HD018942 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RICHARDS, JOHN E · 1988 to 2021
$4.2M
PEDIATRIC STUDY CENTERS (PSCS) FOR A MRI STUDY OF NORMAL-265992319N01NS092319 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 1999 to 2003
$106k
PEDIATRIC STUDY CENTERS (PSCS) FOR A MRI STUDY OF NORMAL-265992314N01NS092314 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · 1985 to 2003
$89k
PEDIATRIC STUDY CENTERS (PSCS) FOR A MRI STUDY OF NORMAL-265992315N01NS092315 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 1999 to 2003
$77k
RESEARCH ROSTER FOR HUNTINGTON'S DISEASEN01NS092320 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · 1985 to 2003
$59k
PEDIATRIC STUDY CENTERS (PSCS)FOR A MRI STUDY OF NORMAL-265992316N01NS092316 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MED CTR (CINCINNATI) · 1999 to 2003
$52k
PEDIATRIC STUDY CENTERS (PSCS) FOR A MRI STUDY OF NORMAL-265992317N01NS092317 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · 1999 to 2003
$48k
MRI STUDY OF NORMAL BRAIN DEVELOPMENT CLINICAL COORDINATING CENTER-275023343N01HD023343 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOTTERON, KELLY · 2006 to 2006
–
DATA COORDINATING CENTER (DCC) FOR A MRI STUDY OF NORMAL-278990002N01MH090002 · NIMH · NEUROVISION SCIENCES, INC. · 1999 to 2003
–
NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD023343NICHD NIH HHS N01-HD02-3343NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD018942NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD018942NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD18942NIMH NIH HHS N01-MH9-0002NINDS NIH HHS N01-NS-9-2314NINDS NIH HHS N01-NS-9-2315NINDS NIH HHS N01-NS-9-2316NINDS NIH HHS N01-NS-9-2317NINDS NIH HHS N01-NS-9-2319NINDS NIH HHS N01-NS-9-2320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate labeling of brain structures within an individual or group is a key issue in neuroimaging. Methods for labeling infant brains have depended on the labels done on adult brains or average magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) templates based on adult brains. However, the features of adult brains differ in several ways from infant brains, so the creation of a labeled stereotaxic atlas based on infants would be helpful. The current work builds on the recent creation of age-appropriate average MRI templates during the first year (3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, and 12 months) by creating anatomical label sets for each template.

methodsWe created stereotaxic atlases for the age-specific average MRI templates. Manual delineation of cortical and subcortical areas was done on the average templates based on infants during the first year. We also applied a procedure for automatic computation of macroanatomical atlases for individual infant participants using two manually segmented adult atlases (Hammers, LONI Probabilistic Brain Atlas-LPBA40). To evaluate our methods, we did manual delineation of several cortical areas on selected individuals from each age. Linear and nonlinear registration of the individual and average template was used to transform the average atlas into the individual participant's space, and the average-transformed atlas was compared to the individual manually delineated brain areas. We also applied these methods to an external data set - not used in the atlas creation - to test generalizability of the atlases.

resultsAge-appropriate manual atlases were the best fit to the individual manually delineated regions, with more error seen at greater age discrepancy. There was a close fit between the manually delineated and the automatically labeled regions for individual participants and for the age-appropriate template-based atlas transformed into participant space. There was close correspondence between automatic labeling of individual brain regions and those from the age-appropriate template. These relationships held even when tested on an external set of images.

conclusionWe have created age-appropriate labeled templates for use in the study of infant development at 6 ages (3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, and 12 months). Comparison with manual methods was quite good. We developed three stereotaxic atlases (one manual, two automatic) for each infant age, which should allow more fine-grained analysis of brain structure for these populations than was previously possible with existing tools. The template-based atlases constructed in the current study are available online (http://jerlab.psych.sc.edu/NeurodevelopmentalMRIDatabase).

Indexed as

Anatomy, ArtisticAtlases as TopicBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID26440296
PMCPMC4644510
OpenAlexW2174697984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.