ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2015
Cultural Factors Shape Olfactory Language.
Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Olfactory training enhances semantic verbal fluency in healthy older adults, but only for individuals with low baseline performance.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Is That "Mr." or "Ms." Lemon? An Investigation of Grammatical and Semantic Gender on the Perception of Household Odorants.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A computational model of language functions in flexible goal-directed behaviour.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Linguistic features of fragrances: The role of grammatical gender and gender associations.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019Article
- An Exception to Mental Simulation: No Evidence for Embodied Odor Language.Cognitive science · 2018Article
- Psycholinguistic variables matter in odor naming.Memory & cognition · 2018Article
- Odor-color associations differ with verbal descriptors for odors: A comparison of three linguistically diverse groups.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26440119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.