Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26440056›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2016

Local and systemic responses following intravitreous injection of AAV2-encoded modified Volvox channelrhodopsin-1 in a genetically blind rat model.

E Sugano, K Tabata, M Takahashi, F Nishiyama, H Shimizu, M Sato, M Tamai, H Tomita

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optogenetic Vision Restoration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optogenetic Therapy for Visual Restoration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optogenetics-Mediated Gene Therapy for Retinal Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E SuganoLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
K TabataLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
M TakahashiLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
F NishiyamaLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
H ShimizuLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
M SatoLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
M TamaiTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
H TomitaLaboratory of Visual Neuroscience, Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Iwate University Graduate School of Engineering, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
Iwate University · JPTohoku University · JPTohoku University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously designed a modified channelrhodopsin-1 (mVChR1) protein chimera with a broader action than that of Chlamydomonas channelrhodopsin-2 and reported that its transduction into retinal ganglion cells can restore visual function in genetically blind, dystrophic Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats, with photostimuli ranging from 486 to 640 nm. In the current study, we sought to investigate the safety and influence of mVChR1 transgene expression. Adeno-associated virus type 2 encoding mVChR1 was administered by intravitreous injection into dystrophic RCS rats. Reverse-transcription PCR was used to monitor virus and transgene dissemination and the results demonstrated that their expression was restricted specifically within the eye tissues, and not in non-target organs. Moreover, examination of the blood, plasma and serum revealed that no excess immunoreactivity was present, as determined using standard clinical hematological parameters. Serum antibodies targeting the recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) capsid increased after the injection; however, no increase in mVChR1 antibody was detected during the observation period. In addition, retinal histological examination showed no signs of inflammation in rAAV-injected rats. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that mVChR1 can be exogenously expressed without harmful immunological reactions in vivo. These findings will aid in studies of AAV gene transfer to restore vision in late-stage retinitis pigmentosa.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAnimalsBlindnessDependovirusDisease Models, AnimalEvoked Potentials, VisualFeasibility StudiesGenetic VectorsImmunity, HumoralIntravitreal InjectionsRatsRetinaRetinitis PigmentosaRhodopsins, MicrobialTissue DistributionTransduction, GeneticRhodopsins, Microbial

Identifiers

PMID26440056
OpenAlexW2408848255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.