Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26439494›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

What's in the Gift? Towards a Molecular Dissection of Nuptial Feeding in a Cricket.

Yannick Pauchet, Natalie Wielsch, Paul A Wilkinson, Scott K Sakaluk, Aleš Svatoš, Richard H ffrench-Constant, John Hunt, David G Heckel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yannick PauchetEntomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Natalie WielschMass spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Paul A WilkinsonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Scott K SakalukBehavior, Ecology, Evolution & Systematics Section, School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, United States of America.
Aleš SvatošMass spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Richard H ffrench-ConstantCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
John HuntCentre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
David G HeckelEntomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEUniversity of Exeter · GBIllinois State University · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuptial gifts produced by males and transferred to females during copulation are common in insects. Yet, their precise composition and subsequent physiological effects on the female recipient remain unresolved. Male decorated crickets Gryllodes sigillatus transfer a spermatophore to the female during copulation that is composed of an edible gift, the spermatophylax, and the ampulla that contains the ejaculate. After transfer of the spermatophore, the female detaches the spermatophylax and starts to eat it while sperm from the ampulla are evacuated into the female reproductive tract. When the female has finished consuming the spermatophylax, she detaches the ampulla and terminates sperm transfer. Hence, one simple function of the spermatophylax is to ensure complete sperm transfer by distracting the female from prematurely removing the ampulla. However, the majority of orally active components of the spermatophylax itself and their subsequent effects on female behavior have not been identified. Here, we report the first analysis of the proteome of the G. sigillatus spermatophylax and the transcriptome of the male accessory glands that make these proteins. The accessory gland transcriptome was assembled into 17,691 transcripts whilst about 30 proteins were detected within the mature spermatophylax itself. Of these 30 proteins, 18 were encoded by accessory gland encoded messages. Most spermatophylax proteins show no similarity to proteins with known biological functions and are therefore largely novel. A spermatophylax protein shows similarity to protease inhibitors suggesting that it may protect the biologically active components from digestion within the gut of the female recipient. Another protein shares similarity with previously characterized insect polypeptide growth factors suggesting that it may play a role in altering female reproductive physiology concurrent with fertilization. Characterization of the spermatophylax proteome provides the first step in identifying the genes encoding these proteins in males and in understanding their biological functions in the female recipient.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSexual Behavior, AnimalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCarbonic AnhydrasesCopulationFemaleGift GivingGryllidaeInsect ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMolecular Sequence DataReproductionSequence AlignmentSpermatogoniaCarbonic AnhydrasesInsect ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26439494
PMCPMC4595131
OpenAlexW2176013417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.