Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26439126›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2015

Microbiological quality of water from the rivers of Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil, and the susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs and pathogenicity of Escherichia coli.

Melissa Giowanella, Angela Bozza, Patricia do Rocio Dalzoto, Jair Alves Dionísio, Sumaia Andraus, Edson Luiz Gomes Guimarães, Ida Chapaval Pimentel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa GiowanellaLaboratório de Microbiologia e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Patologia Básica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico s/n, Jardim das Américas, Caixa Postal 19031, Curitiba, PR, 81531990, Brazil.
Angela BozzaLaboratório de Microbiologia e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Patologia Básica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico s/n, Jardim das Américas, Caixa Postal 19031, Curitiba, PR, 81531990, Brazil.
Patricia do Rocio DalzotoLaboratório de Microbiologia e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Patologia Básica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico s/n, Jardim das Américas, Caixa Postal 19031, Curitiba, PR, 81531990, Brazil. pdalzoto@gmail.com.
Jair Alves DionísioLaboratório de Biologia do Solo, Departamento de Solos e Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Sumaia AndrausInstituto Ambiental do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Edson Luiz Gomes GuimarãesInstituto Ambiental do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Ida Chapaval PimentelLaboratório de Microbiologia e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Patologia Básica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico s/n, Jardim das Américas, Caixa Postal 19031, Curitiba, PR, 81531990, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water safety is determined by several markers, and Escherichia coli is one of the most important indicators of water quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the microbiological parameters in environmental samples of fresh water from rivers of Curitiba and its metropolitan area in Paraná State, Brazil. In addition, we evaluated the pathogenicity and susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs in E. coli. These evaluations were performed by quantitative and qualitative methods employing selective media for isolating thermotolerant coliforms and biochemical tests for identifying E. coli. Pathogenic strains of E. coli were detected by PCR multiplex using specific primers. From the water samples, 494 thermotolerant coliforms were obtained, of which 96 (19.43%) isolates were characterized as E. coli. Three isolates were identified as enteroaggregative E. coli, one as enterotoxigenic E. coli, one as enteropathogenic E. coli, and two carried the Eae virulence gene. E. coli susceptibility to commonly employed antimicrobial drugs was analyzed by the disc diffusion method. The results showed 49 (51.04%) isolates resistant to all the drugs assayed, 16 (16.67%) with an intermediate resistance to all drugs, and 31 (32.29%) intermediately or fully resistant to one or more drugs tested. The highest rate of resistance was observed for tetracycline 30 μg, streptomycin 10 μg, and ceftazidime 30 μg. Detection of E. coli is associated with water contamination by fecal material from humans and warm-blooded animals. The occurrence of resistant strains can be the result of the indiscriminate use of antimicrobial drugs and poor sanitation in the areas assayed.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBrazilEscherichia coliFecesFresh WaterHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRiversVirulenceWaterWater PollutionWater QualityAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsWaterAntibiotic resistanceColiformsMonitoringWater quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.