Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26438865›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Melanopsin-driven increases in maintained activity enhance thalamic visual response reliability across a simulated dawn.

Riccardo Storchi, Nina Milosavljevic, Cyril G Eleftheriou, Franck P Martial, Patrycja Orlowska-Feuer, Robert A Bedford, Timothy M Brown, Marcelo A Montemurro, Rasmus S Petersen, Robert J Lucas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Flp-recombinase mouse line for genetic manipulation of ipRGCs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Selective amplification of ipRGC signals accounts for interictal photophobia in migraine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Riccardo StorchiFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Nina MilosavljevicFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Cyril G EleftheriouFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Franck P MartialFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Patrycja Orlowska-FeuerDepartment of Neurophysiology and Chronobiology, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Krakow, Poland.
Robert A BedfordFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Timothy M BrownFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Marcelo A MontemurroFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Rasmus S PetersenFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom;
Robert J LucasFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom; robert.lucas@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GBJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I007296/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I017836/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twice a day, at dawn and dusk, we experience gradual but very high amplitude changes in background light intensity (irradiance). Although we perceive the associated change in environmental brightness, the representation of such very slow alterations in irradiance by the early visual system has been little studied. Here, we addressed this deficit by recording electrophysiological activity in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus under exposure to a simulated dawn. As irradiance increased we found a widespread enhancement in baseline firing that extended to units with ON as well as OFF responses to fast luminance increments. This change in baseline firing was equally apparent when the slow irradiance ramp appeared alone or when a variety of higher-frequency artificial or natural visual stimuli were superimposed upon it. Using a combination of conventional knockout, chemogenetic, and receptor-silent substitution manipulations, we continued to show that, over higher irradiances, this increase in firing originates with inner-retinal melanopsin photoreception. At the single-unit level, irradiance-dependent increases in baseline firing were strongly correlated with improvements in the amplitude of responses to higher-frequency visual stimuli. This in turn results in an up to threefold increase in single-trial reliability of fast visual responses. In this way, our data indicate that melanopsin drives a generalized increase in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus excitability as dawn progresses that both conveys information about changing background light intensity and increases the signal:noise for fast visual responses.

Indexed as

Vision, OcularAnimalsGeniculate BodiesMelanopsinMiceMice, TransgenicRod OpsinsMelanopsinRod OpsinsDREADDirradiancemelanopsinneural codingsilent substitution

Identifiers

PMID26438865
PMCPMC4620906
OpenAlexW1947690977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.