Trial reportJournal of autism and developmental disorders2016
Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Comprehensive Program for Young Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Trial report in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of social skills training interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi medical journal · 2025Pooled it
- Cognitive Rehabilitation of Adaptive Behavior in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.Occupational therapy international · 2018Pooled it
- Addressing the training gaps for ASD specialists in Kazakhstan: A forecast-based approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned from a University-School District Partnership to Improve Autism Care in Public Schools.Journal of educational and psychological consultation : the official journal of the Association for Educational and Psychological Consultants · 2024Article
- Oral language interventions can improve language outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Campbell systematic reviews · 2023Review
- A Waitlist Randomized Implementation Trial of Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching for Students With Autism.Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities · 2023Article
- School-Implemented Interventions for Preschool to High School Students with Autism: An Update on Recent Research.Current psychiatry reports · 2021Review
- The effect of implementation climate on program fidelity and student outcomes in autism support classrooms.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2019Article
- Transforming Mental Health Delivery Through Behavioral Economics and Implementation Science: Protocol for Three Exploratory Projects.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized, controlled trial, comparing the Comprehensive Autism Program (CAP) and business as usual programs, studied outcomes for 3-5 year old students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Participants included 84 teachers and 302 students with ASD and their parents. CAP utilized specialized curricula and training components to implement specific evidence-based practices both at school and home. A comprehensive set of outcome areas was studied. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to estimate the treatment impact. CAP had small positive impacts on the students' receptive language (effect size of .13) and on their social skills as rated by teachers (effect size of .19). Treatment effects were moderated by severity of ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.