Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26438532›Full record

Observational studyHeart and vessels2016

Use and outcome of thrombus aspiration in patients with primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the multinational Euro Heart Survey PCI Registry.

Kay F Weipert, Timm Bauer, Holger M Nef, Helge Möllmann, Matthias Hochadel, Jean Marco, Franz Weidinger, Uwe Zeymer, Anselm K Gitt, Christian W Hamm

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kay F WeipertDepartment of Cardiology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Timm BauerDepartment of Cardiology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. bauer-timm@gmx.de.
Holger M NefDepartment of Cardiology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Helge MöllmannDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Matthias HochadelInstitut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen Am Rhein, Germany.
Jean MarcoCardio-Thoracic Center of Monaco, Monaco, Monaco.
Franz WeidingerRudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Uwe ZeymerInstitut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen Am Rhein, Germany.
Anselm K GittInstitut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen Am Rhein, Germany.
Christian W HammDepartment of Cardiology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung · DEKerckhoff Klinik · DEUniversity of Giessen · DERudolfinerhaus Hospital · ATScientific Centre of Monaco · MC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical benefit of thrombus aspiration (TA) in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well defined. Furthermore, there is a large variation in the use of TA in real-world registries. Between 2005 and 2008, a total of 7146 consecutive patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary PCI were prospectively enrolled into the PCI Registry of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. For the present analysis, patients treated additionally with TA (n = 897, 12.6 %) were compared with those without TA (n = 6249, 87.4 %). Patients with hemodynamic instability at initial presentation (15.1 vs. 11.0 %; p < 0.001) and resuscitation prior to PCI (10.4 vs. 7.4 %; p = 0.002) were more frequently treated with TA. TIMI flow grade 0/1 before PCI was more often found among those with TA (73.5 vs. 58.6 %; p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors in the propensity score analysis, TA was not associated with improved in-hospital survival (risk difference -1.1 %, 95 % confidence interval -2.7 to 0.6 %). In this European real-world registry, the rate of TA use was low. Hemodynamically unstable patients were more likely to be treated with TA. Consistent with the results of the TASTE study and the TOTAL trial, TA was not associated with a significant reduction in short-term mortality.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionThrombectomyAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationEuropeFemaleHemodynamicsHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk FactorsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionReal-world registryST-elevation myocardial infarctionThrombus aspiration

Identifiers

PMID26438532
OpenAlexW1671815343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.