ArticleBMC genomics2015
Identifying binary protein-protein interactions from affinity purification mass spectrometry data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative phosphoproteomic network analysis identifies CAMK2D as a shared regulator of TPD52 family proteins in cancer.Protoplasma · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of YTHDC1 phosphoproteome unveils its phosphomodulatory network linked to splicing and tumorigenesis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Exploring Viral-Host Protein Interactions as Antiviral Therapies: A Computational Perspective.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- How different viruses perturb host cellular machinery via short linear motifs.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Machine learning in computational modelling of membrane protein sequences and structures: From methodologies to applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Inferring Protein-Protein Interaction Networks From Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Approaches: A Mini-Review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- An Efficient Feature Extraction Technique Based on Local Coding PSSM and Multifeatures Fusion for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2019Article
- A two-step framework for inferring direct protein-protein interaction network from AP-MS data.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Differential network analysis from cross-platform gene expression data.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Protein complex detection based on partially shared multi-view clustering.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of protein-protein interactions contributes greatly to the understanding of functional organization within cells. With the development of affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) techniques, several computational scoring methods have been proposed to detect protein interactions from AP-MS data. However, most of the current methods focus on the detection of co-complex interactions and do not discriminate between direct physical interactions and indirect interactions. Consequently, less is known about the precise physical wiring diagram within cells.
resultsIn this paper, we develop a Binary Interaction Network Model (BINM) to computationally identify direct physical interactions from co-complex interactions which can be inferred from purification data using previous scoring methods. This model provides a mathematical framework for capturing topological relationships between direct physical interactions and observed co-complex interactions. It reassigns a confidence score to each observed interaction to indicate its propensity to be a direct physical interaction. Then observed interactions with high confidence scores are predicted as direct physical interactions. We run our model on two yeast co-complex interaction networks which are constructed by two different scoring methods on a same combined AP-MS data. The direct physical interactions identified by various methods are comprehensively benchmarked against different reference sets that provide both direct and indirect evidence for physical contacts. Experiment results show that our model has a competitive performance over the state-of-the-art methods.
conclusionsAccording to the results obtained in this study, BINM is a powerful scoring method that can solely use network topology to predict direct physical interactions from AP-MS data. This study provides us an alternative approach to explore the information inherent in AP-MS data. The software can be downloaded from https://github.com/Zhangxf-ccnu/BINM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.