ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2016
Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natalizumab and Tyruko (natalizumab biosimilar) for treating highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after at least one disease-modifying therapy: a systematic review and economic model.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of testing for alemtuzumab antidrug antibodies to guide treatment in multiple sclerosis: a modelling study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Evaluating natalizumab first-line and later-line use in multiple sclerosis: a US claims database analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Effects of a Digital Care Pathway for Multiple Sclerosis: Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Observational
- Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Health economics review · 2024Review
- Real-World Evidence on the Societal Economic Relapse Costs in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Observational
- Differentiating societal costs of disability worsening in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- The long-term costs for treating multiple sclerosis in a 16-year retrospective cohort study in Brazil.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Factors Associated with Postrelapse Rehabilitation Use in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Survey.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelapses can have a major impact on the lives of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), and yet relapse-related healthcare costs have received little attention. This has limited cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments for MS and hampered decision-making regarding the funding of MS healthcare services.
objectiveTo describe health/social care resource use and costs according to the frequency, severity, and endurance of MS relapses.
methodsData from the prospective, longitudinal UK South West Impact of Multiple Sclerosis cohort were used. A total of 11,800 questionnaires from 1441 people with MS were available, including data on relapses, contacts with health/social care professionals, and other MS-related resource use.
resultsThe mean (SD) 6-monthly MS-related health/social care cost for individuals who reported a relapse was £519 (£949), compared to £229 (£366) for those who had not did report a relapse. Care costs varied widely dependent on the characteristics of the relapse. The mean (SD) cost when a relapse was not treated with steroids was £381 (£780), whilst the equivalent cost was £3579 (£1727) when a relapse resulted in hospitalization.
conclusionsThe impact of relapses on health and social care resources and costs differs according to their frequency, length, and severity. The data provided here can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses and to inform decision-making regarding healthcare provision for people with this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26438399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.