Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26438225›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

TaylorActive--Examining the effectiveness of web-based personally-tailored videos to increase physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

C Vandelanotte, C Short, R C Plotnikoff, C Hooker, D Canoy, A Rebar, S Alley, S Schoeppe, W K Mummery, M J Duncan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C VandelanottePhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. c.vandelanotte@cqu.edu.au.
C ShortFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. camille.short@adelaide.edu.au.
R C PlotnikoffPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia. ron.plotnikoff@newcastle.edu.au.
C HookerPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. c.hooker@cqu.edu.au.
D CanoyPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. d.canoy@cqu.edu.au.
A RebarPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. a.rebar@cqu.edu.au.
S AlleyPhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. s.alley@cqu.edu.au.
S SchoeppePhysical Activity Research Group, School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia. s.schoeppe@cqu.edu.au.
W K MummeryFaculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. kerry.mummery@ualberta.ca.
M J DuncanPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia. mitch.duncan@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity levels are unacceptably high and effective interventions that can increase physical activity in large populations at low cost are urgently needed. Web-based interventions that use computer-tailoring have shown to be effective, though people tend to 'skim' and 'scan' text on the Internet rather than thoroughly read it. The use of online videos is, however, popular and engaging. Therefore, the aim of this 3-group randomised controlled trial is to examine whether a web-based physical activity intervention that provides personally-tailored videos is more effective when compared with traditional personally-tailored text-based intervention and a control group. METHODS/

designIn total 510 Australians will be recruited through social media advertisements, e-mail and third party databases. Participants will be randomised to one of three groups: text-tailored, video-tailored, or control. All groups will gain access to the same web-based platform and a library containing brief physical activity articles. The text-tailored group will additionally have access to 8 sessions of personalised physical activity advice that is instantaneously generated based on responses to brief online surveys. The theory-based advice will be provided over a period of 3 months and address constructs such as self-efficacy, motivation, goal setting, intentions, social support, attitudes, barriers, outcome expectancies, relapse prevention and feedback on performance. Text-tailored participants will also be able to complete 7 action plans to help them plan what, when, where, who with, and how they will become more active. Participants in the video-tailored group will gain access to the same intervention content as those in the text-tailored group, however all sessions will be provided as personalised videos rather than text on a webpage. The control group will only gain access to the library with generic physical activity articles. The primary outcome is objectively measured physical activity. Secondary outcomes include website engagement and retention, quality of life, depression, anxiety, stress, sitting time, sleep and psychosocial correlates of physical activity. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 3, and 9 months. DISCUSSION: This study presents an ideal opportunity to study the effectiveness of an isolated feature within a web-based physical activity intervention and the knowledge generated from this study will help to increase intervention effectiveness.

trial registrationAustralian New-Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12615000057583 . Registered 22 January 2015. CQUniversity Ethics Project Number: H14/07-163.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthExerciseInternetVideo RecordingAustraliaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMotivationProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID26438225
PMCPMC4594649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.