Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26438147›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Psychological distress, optimism and general health in breast cancer survivors: a data linkage study using the Scottish Health Survey.

Janni Leung, Iain Atherton, Richard G Kyle, Gill Hubbard, Deirdre McLaughlin

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Big Data in Head and Neck Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on the Level of Hope and Psychological Health Status of Patients with Cervical Cancer During Radiotherapy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Janni LeungSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia. j.leung1@uq.edu.au.
Iain AthertonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH14 1DJ, UK.
Richard G KyleSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH14 1DJ, UK.
Gill HubbardSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Scotland, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Deirdre McLaughlinSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Edinburgh Napier University · GBUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to examine the association between optimism and psychological distress in women with breast cancer after taking into account their self-rated general health.

methodsData were aggregated from the Scottish Health Survey (2008 to 2011) to derive a nationally representative sample of 12,255 women (11,960 cancer-free controls, and 295 breast cancer cases identified from linked cancer registry data). The explanatory variables were optimism and general health, and the outcome variable was symptoms of psychological distress. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, with optimism entered in step 1 and general health entered in step 2.

resultsIn an unadjusted model, higher levels of optimism were associated with lower odds of psychological distress in both the control group (OR = 0. 57, 95 % CI = 0.51-0.60) and breast cancer group (OR = 0. 64, 95 % CI = 0.47-0.88). However, in a model adjusting for general health, optimism was associated with lower odds of psychological distress only in the control group (OR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.44-0.57), but not significantly in the breast cancer group (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI = 0.32-4.11). In the breast cancer group, poor general health was a stronger associate of psychological distress (OR = 4. 98, 95 % CI = 1.32-18.75). Results were consistent after adjusting for age, years since breast cancer diagnosis, survey year, socioeconomic status, education, marital status, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.

conclusionThis research confirms the value of multicomponent supportive care interventions for women with breast cancer. Specifically, it suggests that following breast cancer diagnosis, health care professionals need to provide advice and signpost to services that assist women to maintain or improve both their psychological and general health.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMarital StatusMiddle AgedOptimismScotlandSocial ClassStress, PsychologicalBreast cancerMental healthOptimismPsychological distressPsychosocialSelf-rated health

Identifiers

PMID26438147
OpenAlexW1885631923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.