Trial reportLeukemia2016
Frontline nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: results from the European ENEST1st study.
Trial report in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral arsenic plus imatinib versus imatinib solely for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized phase 3 trial with 5-year outcomes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Trial
- Optimal treatment strategy with nilotinib for patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia based on early achievement of deep molecular response (MRCancer medicine · 2020Trial
- A phase 4 study of nilotinib in Korean patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTKorea.Cancer medicine · 2018Trial
- Defining therapy goals for major molecular remission in chronic myeloid leukemia: results of the randomized CML Study IV.Leukemia · 2018Trial
- Nilotinib dose-optimization in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase: final results from ENESTxtnd.British journal of haematology · 2017Trial
- Single cell immune profiling by mass cytometry of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with nilotinib.Haematologica · 2017Trial
- Impact of age on efficacy and toxicity of nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENEST1st subanalysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017Trial
- Nilotinib first-line therapy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative/BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENEST1st sub-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Trial
- Nilotinib 300 mg twice daily: an academic single-arm study of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients.Haematologica · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- The Hasford Score May Predict Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Single Institution Experience.Disease markers · 2016Trial
- Article
- Targeting Mitochondrial Vulnerabilities in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: From Pathobiology to Novel Therapeutic Opportunities.Cancers · 2026Review
- Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia treated with second-line nilotinib-association of molecular milestones and prognostic scores with deep molecular response: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
- Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Revisiting the "W" Questions.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials as First-Line Treatment (ENEST1st) study included 1089 patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. The rate of deep molecular response (MR(4) (BCR-ABL1⩽0.01% on the International Scale or undetectable BCR-ABL1 with ⩾10,000 ABL1 transcripts)) at 18 months was evaluated as the primary end point, with molecular responses monitored by the European Treatment and Outcome Study network of standardized laboratories. This analysis was conducted after all patients had completed 24 months of study treatment (80.9% of patients) or discontinued early. In patients with typical BCR-ABL1 transcripts and ⩽3 months of prior imatinib therapy, 38.4% (404/1052) achieved MR(4) at 18 months. Six patients (0.6%) developed accelerated or blastic phase, and 13 (1.2%) died. The safety profile of nilotinib was consistent with that of previous studies, although the frequencies of some nilotinib-associated adverse events were lower (for example, rash, 21.4%). Ischemic cardiovascular events occurred in 6.0% of patients. Routine monitoring of lipid and glucose levels was not mandated in the protocol. These results support the use of frontline nilotinib, particularly when achievement of a deep molecular response (a prerequisite for attempting treatment-free remission in clinical trials) is a treatment goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.