Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26437714›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Interlog protein network: an evolutionary benchmark of protein interaction networks for the evaluation of clustering algorithms.

Mohieddin Jafari, Mehdi Mirzaie, Mehdi Sadeghi

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohieddin JafariDrug Design and Bioinformatics Unit, Medical Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, 69 Pasteur St, PO Box 13164, Tehran, Iran. mjafari@ipm.ir.
Mehdi MirzaieDepartment of Computational Biology, Faculty of High Technologies, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal Ale Ahmad Highway, PO Box 14115-111, Tehran, Iran. mirzaie@ipm.ir.
Mehdi SadeghiNational Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Pajoohesh Blvd, 17 Km Tehran-Karaj Highway, PO Box 161-14965, Tehran, Iran. sadeghi@nigeb.ac.ir.
National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the field of network science, exploring principal and crucial modules or communities is critical in the deduction of relationships and organization of complex networks. This approach expands an arena, and thus allows further study of biological functions in the field of network biology. As the clustering algorithms that are currently employed in finding modules have innate uncertainties, external and internal validations are necessary.

methodsSequence and network structure alignment, has been used to define the Interlog Protein Network (IPN). This network is an evolutionarily conserved network with communal nodes and less false-positive links. In the current study, the IPN is employed as an evolution-based benchmark in the validation of the module finding methods. The clustering results of five algorithms; Markov Clustering (MCL), Restricted Neighborhood Search Clustering (RNSC), Cartographic Representation (CR), Laplacian Dynamics (LD) and Genetic Algorithm; to find communities in Protein-Protein Interaction networks (GAPPI) are assessed by IPN in four distinct Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PPINs).

resultsThe MCL shows a more accurate algorithm based on this evolutionary benchmarking approach. Also, the biological relevance of proteins in the IPN modules generated by MCL is compatible with biological standard databases such as Gene Ontology, KEGG and Reactome.

conclusionIn this study, the IPN shows its potential for validation of clustering algorithms due to its biological logic and straightforward implementation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBenchmarkingBiological EvolutionCluster AnalysisHumansMarkov ChainsMitochondriaProtein Interaction MapsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26437714
PMCPMC4595048
OpenAlexW1941947567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.