ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Interlog protein network: an evolutionary benchmark of protein interaction networks for the evaluation of clustering algorithms.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNAM-1 mediates NK-cell activation and host-pathogen interaction via direct binding to fungal cell wall proteases.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Computational Network Inference for Bacterial Interactomics.mSystems · 2022Review
- Unsupervised Learning and Multipartite Network Models: A Promising Approach for Understanding Traditional Medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Predicting Meridian in Chinese traditional medicine using machine learning approaches.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- IMMAN: an R/Bioconductor package for Interolog protein network reconstruction, mapping and mining analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A systematic survey of centrality measures for protein-protein interaction networks.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Systems Biomedicine of Rabies Delineates the Affected Signaling Pathways.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the field of network science, exploring principal and crucial modules or communities is critical in the deduction of relationships and organization of complex networks. This approach expands an arena, and thus allows further study of biological functions in the field of network biology. As the clustering algorithms that are currently employed in finding modules have innate uncertainties, external and internal validations are necessary.
methodsSequence and network structure alignment, has been used to define the Interlog Protein Network (IPN). This network is an evolutionarily conserved network with communal nodes and less false-positive links. In the current study, the IPN is employed as an evolution-based benchmark in the validation of the module finding methods. The clustering results of five algorithms; Markov Clustering (MCL), Restricted Neighborhood Search Clustering (RNSC), Cartographic Representation (CR), Laplacian Dynamics (LD) and Genetic Algorithm; to find communities in Protein-Protein Interaction networks (GAPPI) are assessed by IPN in four distinct Protein-Protein Interaction Networks (PPINs).
resultsThe MCL shows a more accurate algorithm based on this evolutionary benchmarking approach. Also, the biological relevance of proteins in the IPN modules generated by MCL is compatible with biological standard databases such as Gene Ontology, KEGG and Reactome.
conclusionIn this study, the IPN shows its potential for validation of clustering algorithms due to its biological logic and straightforward implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.