ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2015
Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- VacStent as a novel therapeutic approach for esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks- a systematic review of the literature.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Real-world management and in-hospital outcomes of foreign body-associated esophageal perforations in the United States: a national retrospective cohort study.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Severity-guided management of esophageal perforation: a retrospective cohort study supporting a pragmatic treatment algorithm.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
- Article
- Endoscopic stenting as salvage therapy for high-risk Boerhaave's syndrome patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The Impact of Endoscopic Dilatation in Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Stricture: Risk Factors and Treatment Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Modified thoracoplasty for esophago-pleural fistula following Boerhaave syndrome: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Spontaneous esophageal rupture visualized by means of transthoracic echocardiography.Journal of echocardiography · 2024Article
- Surgical Management of Esophageal Perforation: Examining Trends in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Advances in minimal invasive treatment for esophageal perforation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Esophagram should be performed to diagnose esophageal perforation before inter-hospital transfer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic Repair of Spontaneous Esophageal Perforation After Multiple Endoscopic Failures.Cureus · 2022Article
- Iatrogenic Esophagopleural Fistula After the Management of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage With Minnesota Tube Placement.ACG case reports journal · 2022Article
- Current status of surgical treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2022Article
- Current Status of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Esophageal Perforations and Post-Operative Leaks.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Minimally invasive surgical management of Boerhaave's syndrome: a narrative literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTraditionally esophageal perforation is a rare clinical emergency that confers a high rate of mortality and major morbidity. The objective of this study was to establish the annual rate and mortality from esophageal perforation and determine the effect of hospital volume on clinical outcomes.
methodsHospital Episode Statistics database was used for the identification of patients admitted to hospitals within England with esophageal perforation between 2001 and 2012. The influence of hospital volume and treatment approach upon clinical outcomes was analyzed using multivariable analysis to control for patient age and medical comorbidities that may influence outcome.
resultsOver the 12-year study period 2,564 patients with esophageal perforation were treated at 158 hospitals. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 30.0 and 38.8%, respectively. Esophageal perforation etiology was spontaneous in 81.9% and iatrogenic in 5.9% of cases. There was a significant increase in the percentage of patients managed supportively and a reduction in surgical management over time. Furthermore there were significant reductions in 30-day (36.6% to 24.9%; P<0.001) and 90-day mortality (44.1% to 35.4%; P=0.006) over the 12-year study period. Important patient demographics associated with 30- and 90-day mortality included age ≥70 years, preoperative congestive cardiac failure, ischemic heart, liver, and renal disease. High hospital volume was associated with significant reductions in 30- (odds ratio (OR)=0.68; P=0.001) and 90-day mortality (OR=0.69; P=0.001). In a subset analysis of patients undergoing endoscopic intervention, hospital volume was identified as an important factor associated with mortality.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence for the centralization of management of esophageal perforation to high volume centers with appropriate multi-disciplinary infrastructure to treat these complex patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26437667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.