Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26437644›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Are commercial probiotics and prebiotics effective in the treatment and prevention of honeybee nosemosis C?

Aneta A Ptaszyńska, Grzegorz Borsuk, Agnieszka Zdybicka-Barabas, Małgorzata Cytryńska, Wanda Małek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Direct-Fed Microorganism Syrup on Honey Bee (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Isolation and probiotic evaluation of Apilactobacillus kunkeei and Bombella sp. from Apis mellifera anatoliaca and Bombus terrestris.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aneta A PtaszyńskaDepartment of Botany and Mycology, Institute of Biology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 19 Akademicka st., 20-033, Lublin, Poland. aneta.ptaszynska@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-6028
Grzegorz BorsukDepartment of Biological Basis of Animal Production, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, University of Life Sciences, 13 Akademicka st., 20-950, Lublin, Poland.
Agnieszka Zdybicka-BarabasDepartment of Immunobiology, Institute of Biology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 19 Akademicka st., 20-033, Lublin, Poland.
Małgorzata CytryńskaDepartment of Immunobiology, Institute of Biology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 19 Akademicka st., 20-033, Lublin, Poland.
Wanda MałekDepartment of Genetics and Microbiology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 19 Akademicka st., 20-033, Lublin, Poland.
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (a commercial probiotic) and inulin (a prebiotic) on the survival rates of honeybees infected and uninfected with Nosema ceranae, the level of phenoloxidase (PO) activity, the course of nosemosis, and the effect on the prevention of nosemosis development in bees. The cells of L. rhamnosus exhibited a high rate of survival in 56.56 % sugar syrup, which was used to feed the honeybees. Surprisingly, honeybees fed with sugar syrup supplemented with a commercial probiotic and a probiotic + prebiotic were more susceptible to N. ceranae infection, and their lifespan was much shorter. The number of microsporidian spores in the honeybees fed for 9 days prior to N. ceranae infection with a sugar syrup supplemented with a commercial probiotic was 25 times higher (970 million spores per one honeybee) than in a control group fed with pure sucrose syrup (38 million spores per one honeybee). PO activity reached its highest level in the hemolymph of this honeybee control group uninfected with N. ceranae. The addition of probiotics or both probiotics and prebiotics to the food of uninfected bees led to the ~2-fold decrease in the PO activity. The infection of honeybees with N. ceranae accompanied an almost 20-fold decrease in the PO level. The inulin supplemented solely at a concentration of 2 μg/mL was the only administrated factor which did not significantly affect honeybees' survival, the PO activity, or the nosemosis infection level. In conclusion, the supplementation of honeybees' diet with improperly selected probiotics or both probiotics and prebiotics does not prevent nosemosis development, can de-regulate insect immune systems, and may significantly increase bee mortality.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeekeepingBeesDNA, FungalHemolymphInulinLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusMonophenol MonooxygenaseMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNosemaPrebioticsProbioticsRandom AllocationDNA, FungalInulinMonophenol MonooxygenasePrebioticsApis mellifera survivalLactobacillus rhamnosus, inulinNosema ceranaePhenoloxidase activityPrebioticProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID26437644
PMCPMC4700093
OpenAlexW1890060878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.