Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26437591›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2016

Border Safety: Quality Control at the Nuclear Envelope.

Brant M Webster, C Patrick Lusk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Mechanisms for the Regulation of Nuclear Membrane Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. The LEM-ESCRT toolkit: Repair and maintenance of the nucleus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Torsin ATPases: Harnessing Dynamic Instability for Function.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brant M WebsterYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
C Patrick LuskYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: patrick.lusk@yale.edu.

Funding

Skill Development for Diverse Scientific Careers: A New Course Predoctoral Program in Cellular and Molecular BiologyT32GM007223 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BASERGA, SUSAN J · 1985 to 2019
$31.0M
The mechanism of ESCRT-mediated surveillance of the nuclear envelope barrierR01GM105672 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LUSK, CHARLES PATRICK · 2013 to 2025
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105672NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique biochemical identity of the nuclear envelope confers its capacity to establish a barrier that protects the nuclear compartment and directly contributes to nuclear function. Recent work uncovered quality control mechanisms employing the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery and a new arm of endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) to counteract the unfolding, damage, or misassembly of nuclear envelope proteins and ensure the integrity of the nuclear envelope membranes. Moreover, cells have the capacity to recognize and triage defective nuclear pore complexes to prevent their inheritance and preserve the longevity of progeny. These mechanisms serve to highlight the diverse strategies used by cells to maintain nuclear compartmentalization; we suggest they mitigate the progression and severity of diseases associated with nuclear envelope malfunction such as the laminopathies.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsEndoplasmic Reticulum-Associated DegradationEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportHumansNuclear EnvelopeNuclear ProteinsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportNuclear ProteinscompartmentalizationERADESCRTinner nuclear membranenuclear envelopenuclear pore complexquality control

Identifiers

PMID26437591
PMCPMC4698192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.