Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26437225›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Chemogenetic profiling identifies RAD17 as synthetically lethal with checkpoint kinase inhibition.

John Paul Shen, Rohith Srivas, Andrew Gross, Jianfeng Li, Eric J Jaehnig, Su Ming Sun, Ana Bojorquez-Gomez, Katherine Licon, Vignesh Sivaganesh, Jia L Xu and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John Paul ShenDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Rohith SrivasDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Andrew GrossBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jianfeng LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Eric J JaehnigDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Su Ming SunDepartment of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ana Bojorquez-GomezDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Katherine LiconDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Vignesh SivaganeshDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jia L XuDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kristin KlepperDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Huwate YeernaDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Daniel PekinDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Chu Ping QiuDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Haico van AttikumDepartment of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert W SobolDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Trey IdekerDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of South Alabama · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
A Systems Approach to Mapping the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES014811 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2005 to 2021
$8.6M
Novel approaches to enhance tumor cell cytotoxicity of alkylating agentsR01CA148629 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI SOBOL, ROBERT W · 2010 to 2021
$3.4M
DNA repair deficient cells for analysisR44GM087798 · NIGMS · TREVIGEN, INC. · PI GEORGE, JAY, SOBOL, ROBERT W · 2010 to 2011
$2.5M
DNA repair deficient human cells for genomic variation analysisR43GM087798 · NIGMS · TREVIGEN, INC. · PI GEORGE, JAY, SOBOL, ROBERT W · 2009 to 2009
$200k
NCI NIH HHS CA148629NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P30CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148629NIEHS NIH HHS ES014811NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014811NIGMS NIH HHS GM087798NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM087798NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM087798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical inhibitors of the checkpoint kinases have shown promise in the treatment of cancer, yet their clinical utility may be limited by a lack of molecular biomarkers to identify specific patients most likely to respond to therapy. To this end, we screened 112 known tumor suppressor genes for synthetic lethal interactions with inhibitors of the CHEK1 and CHEK2 checkpoint kinases. We identified eight interactions, including the Replication Factor C (RFC)-related protein RAD17. Clonogenic assays in RAD17 knockdown cell lines identified a substantial shift in sensitivity to checkpoint kinase inhibition (3.5-fold) as compared to RAD17 wild-type. Additional evidence for this interaction was found in a large-scale functional shRNA screen of over 100 genotyped cancer cell lines, in which CHEK1/2 mutant cell lines were unexpectedly sensitive to RAD17 knockdown. This interaction was widely conserved, as we found that RAD17 interacts strongly with checkpoint kinases in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the setting of RAD17 knockdown, CHEK1/2 inhibition was found to be synergistic with inhibition of WEE1, another pharmacologically relevant checkpoint kinase. Accumulation of the DNA damage marker γH2AX following chemical inhibition or transient knockdown of CHEK1, CHEK2 or WEE1 was magnified by knockdown of RAD17. Taken together, our data suggest that CHEK1 or WEE1 inhibitors are likely to have greater clinical efficacy in tumors with RAD17 loss-of-function.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDrug DiscoveryHeLa CellsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsProtein Kinases3-(carbamoylamino)-5-(3-fluorophenyl)-N-(3-piperidyl)thiophene-2-carboxamideAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2CHEK1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesRad17 protein, humanRAD17 protein, S cerevisiaeRNA, Small InterferingSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSWE1 protein, S cerevisiaeThiophenesUreabiomarkercheckpoint kinase inhibitorDNA damageRAD17synthetic lethal

Identifiers

PMID26437225
PMCPMC4742139
OpenAlexW2190422702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.