Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2016
Cerebrospinal fluid chimerism analysis in patients with neurological symptoms after allogeneic cell transplantation.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Case report.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2024Article
- Low donor chimerism may be sufficient to prevent demyelination in adrenoleukodystrophy.JIMD reports · 2022Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for primary central nervous system lymphoma.Haematologica · 2020Article
- Donor cell chimerism evaluation in cerebrospinal fluid by short tandem repeat analysis following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Human immunology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) complications have been described in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is included in the diagnostic workup in patients with neurological symptoms after alloHCT. CSF donor-recipient chimerism analysis usually is not used to evaluate patients with neurological complications after alloHCT. To assess the potential contribution of CSF donor-recipient chimerism in patients with neurological complications, we analyzed 85 CSF samples from 50 patients with neurological complications after alloHCT. After alloHCT, 21 patients showed the presence of recipient-derived DNA. In 13 of these patients, recurrence of the underlying disease was detected in CSF. There was a moderate correlation between the recipient DNA percentage as detected by short tandem repeat (STR) amplification and the cell concentration in CSF (Spearmann r: 0.66 P=0.004). The percentage of cells with immunophenotypic abnormalities from patients relapsing in the CNS detected by flow cytometry showed a strong correlation with the percentage of recipient-derived DNA in CSF assessed by STR analysis (Spearmann r: 0.83 P=0.0008). Donor-recipient chimerism analysis in CSF in patients with neurological symptoms after alloHCT is a practical, feasible and useful complementary method to the already established methodologies included in the diagnostic workup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.