Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26437032›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2015

Intron retention is a widespread mechanism of tumor-suppressor inactivation.

Hyunchul Jung, Donghoon Lee, Jongkeun Lee, Donghyun Park, Yeon Jeong Kim, Woong-Yang Park, Dongwan Hong, Peter J Park, Eunjung Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 220 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
220citing papers in PubMed
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

220 citing papers in PubMed, 357 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

160 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyunchul JungResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Donghoon LeeResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0453-6059
Jongkeun LeeResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Donghyun ParkSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Yeon Jeong KimSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Woong-Yang ParkSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4234-0380
Dongwan HongResearch Institute, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-1299
Peter J ParkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-960X
Eunjung LeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USNational Cancer Center · USSamsung Medical Center · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KRYale University · US

Funding

The role of somatic mutation in neurodegenerative diseaseK01AG051791 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEE, EUNJUNG ALICE · 2016 to 2020
$655k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial fraction of disease-causing mutations are pathogenic through aberrant splicing. Although genome profiling studies have identified somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in cancer, the extent to which these variants trigger abnormal splicing has not been systematically examined. Here we analyzed RNA sequencing and exome data from 1,812 patients with cancer and identified ∼900 somatic exonic SNVs that disrupt splicing. At least 163 SNVs, including 31 synonymous ones, were shown to cause intron retention or exon skipping in an allele-specific manner, with ∼70% of the SNVs occurring on the last base of exons. Notably, SNVs causing intron retention were enriched in tumor suppressors, and 97% of these SNVs generated a premature termination codon, leading to loss of function through nonsense-mediated decay or truncated protein. We also characterized the genomic features predictive of such splicing defects. Overall, this work demonstrates that intron retention is a common mechanism of tumor-suppressor inactivation.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCodon, NonsenseExomeExonsHumansIntronsModels, GeneticNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, RNATumor Suppressor ProteinsCodon, NonsenseTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26437032
OpenAlexW1846422913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.