Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26436773›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Deep-Sea, Deep-Sequencing: Metabarcoding Extracellular DNA from Sediments of Marine Canyons.

Magdalena Guardiola, María Jesús Uriz, Pierre Taberlet, Eric Coissac, Owen Simon Wangensteen, Xavier Turon

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ecological interactions in glacier environments: a review of studies on a model Alpine glacier.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Magdalena GuardiolaDepartment of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain.
María Jesús UrizDepartment of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain.
Pierre TaberletUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000, Grenoble, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Eric CoissacUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000, Grenoble, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Owen Simon WangensteenDepartment of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain; Department of Animal Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier TuronDepartment of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain.
Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes · ESUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine sediments are home to one of the richest species pools on Earth, but logistics and a dearth of taxonomic work-force hinders the knowledge of their biodiversity. We characterized α- and β-diversity of deep-sea assemblages from submarine canyons in the western Mediterranean using an environmental DNA metabarcoding. We used a new primer set targeting a short eukaryotic 18S sequence (ca. 110 bp). We applied a protocol designed to obtain extractions enriched in extracellular DNA from replicated sediment corers. With this strategy we captured information from DNA (local or deposited from the water column) that persists adsorbed to inorganic particles and buffered short-term spatial and temporal heterogeneity. We analysed replicated samples from 20 localities including 2 deep-sea canyons, 1 shallower canal, and two open slopes (depth range 100-2,250 m). We identified 1,629 MOTUs, among which the dominant groups were Metazoa (with representatives of 19 phyla), Alveolata, Stramenopiles, and Rhizaria. There was a marked small-scale heterogeneity as shown by differences in replicates within corers and within localities. The spatial variability between canyons was significant, as was the depth component in one of the canyons where it was tested. Likewise, the composition of the first layer (1 cm) of sediment was significantly different from deeper layers. We found that qualitative (presence-absence) and quantitative (relative number of reads) data showed consistent trends of differentiation between samples and geographic areas. The subset of exclusively benthic MOTUs showed similar patterns of β-diversity and community structure as the whole dataset. Separate analyses of the main metazoan phyla (in number of MOTUs) showed some differences in distribution attributable to different lifestyles. Our results highlight the differentiation that can be found even between geographically close assemblages, and sets the ground for future monitoring and conservation efforts on these bottoms of ecological and economic importance.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicGeologic SedimentsAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBiodiversityBiotaDNADNA, RibosomalEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFisheriesMediterranean SeaRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence Analysis, DNADNADNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID26436773
PMCPMC4593591
OpenAlexW2168564982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.