ArticleACS synthetic biology2016
Characterization of Intrinsic Properties of Promoters.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- The adaptive landscapes of three globaleLife · 2026Article
- Construction of aACS omega · 2025Article
- Spatial biology of Ising-like synthetic genetic networks.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Supervised promoter recognition: a benchmark framework.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Accurate characterization of dynamic microbial gene expression and growth rate profiles.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- A call for caution in analysing mammalian co-transfection experiments and implications of resource competition in data misinterpretation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Functional Pleiotropy of p73 in Cancer and Beyond.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Interpretation of morphogen gradients by a synthetic bistable circuit.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Congo Red Fluorescence for RapidApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Development of a novel strategy for robust synthetic bacterial promoters based on a stepwise evolution targeting the spacer region of the core promoter in Bacillus subtilis.Microbial cell factories · 2019Article
- Recent Advances and Current Challenges in Synthetic Biology of the Plastid Genetic System and Metabolism.Plant physiology · 2019Review
- Prediction and characterization of promoters and ribosomal binding sites ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
- Rational engineering of synthetic microbial systems: from single cells to consortia.Current opinion in microbiology · 2018Review
- Programmed hierarchical patterning of bacterial populations.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Tuning the dynamic range of bacterial promoters regulated by ligand-inducible transcription factors.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Scaling up genetic circuit design for cellular computing: advances and prospects.Natural computing · 2018Article
- Glucose-Dependent Promoters for Dynamic Regulation of Metabolic Pathways.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018Article
- Calibrating Transcriptional Activity Using Constitutive Synthetic Promoters in Mutants for Global Regulators inInternational journal of genomics · 2018Article
- Repressor logic modules assembled by rolling circle amplification platform to construct a set of logic gates.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate characterization of promoter behavior is essential for the rational design of functional synthetic transcription networks such as logic gates and oscillators. However, transcription rates observed from promoters can vary significantly depending on the growth rate of host cells and the experimental and genetic contexts of the measurement. Furthermore, in vivo measurement methods must accommodate variation in translation, protein folding, and maturation rates of reporter proteins, as well as metabolic load. The external factors affecting transcription activity may be considered to be extrinsic, and the goal of characterization should be to obtain quantitative measures of the intrinsic characteristics of promoters. We have developed a promoter characterization method that is based on a mathematical model for cell growth and reporter gene expression and exploits multiple in vivo measurements to compensate for variation due to extrinsic factors. First, we used optical density and fluorescent reporter gene measurements to account for the effect of differing cell growth rates. Second, we compared the output of reporter genes to that of a control promoter using concurrent dual-channel fluorescence measurements. This allowed us to derive a quantitative promoter characteristic (ρ) that provides a robust measure of the intrinsic properties of a promoter, relative to the control. We imposed different extrinsic factors on growing cells, altering carbon source and adding bacteriostatic agents, and demonstrated that the use of ρ values reduced the fraction of variance due to extrinsic factors from 78% to less than 4%. This is a simple and reliable method to quantitatively describe promoter properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.