Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26436725›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2016

Characterization of Intrinsic Properties of Promoters.

Timothy J Rudge, James R Brown, Fernan Federici, Neil Dalchau, Andrew Phillips, James W Ajioka, Jim Haseloff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Construction of aACS omega · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms of Functional Pleiotropy of p73 in Cancer and Beyond.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Congo Red Fluorescence for RapidApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Glucose-Dependent Promoters for Dynamic Regulation of Metabolic Pathways.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy J RudgeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
James R BrownDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Fernan FedericiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Neil DalchauBiological Computation Group, Microsoft Research , Cambridge CB1 2FB, United Kingdom.
Andrew PhillipsBiological Computation Group, Microsoft Research , Cambridge CB1 2FB, United Kingdom.
James W AjiokaDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge , Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, United Kingdom.
Jim HaseloffDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge , Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014130/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate characterization of promoter behavior is essential for the rational design of functional synthetic transcription networks such as logic gates and oscillators. However, transcription rates observed from promoters can vary significantly depending on the growth rate of host cells and the experimental and genetic contexts of the measurement. Furthermore, in vivo measurement methods must accommodate variation in translation, protein folding, and maturation rates of reporter proteins, as well as metabolic load. The external factors affecting transcription activity may be considered to be extrinsic, and the goal of characterization should be to obtain quantitative measures of the intrinsic characteristics of promoters. We have developed a promoter characterization method that is based on a mathematical model for cell growth and reporter gene expression and exploits multiple in vivo measurements to compensate for variation due to extrinsic factors. First, we used optical density and fluorescent reporter gene measurements to account for the effect of differing cell growth rates. Second, we compared the output of reporter genes to that of a control promoter using concurrent dual-channel fluorescence measurements. This allowed us to derive a quantitative promoter characteristic (ρ) that provides a robust measure of the intrinsic properties of a promoter, relative to the control. We imposed different extrinsic factors on growing cells, altering carbon source and adding bacteriostatic agents, and demonstrated that the use of ρ values reduced the fraction of variance due to extrinsic factors from 78% to less than 4%. This is a simple and reliable method to quantitatively describe promoter properties.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticFluorescenceGenes, ReporterLuminescent ProteinsPlasmidsProtein BiosynthesisLuminescent Proteinscharacterizationdesignfluorescencemodelingpromoterquantificationratiometrictranscription

Identifiers

PMID26436725
PMCPMC5023225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.