ArticlePsychological medicine2016
Predicting non-familial major physical violent crime perpetration in the US Army from administrative data.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting criminal and violent outcomes in psychiatry: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Translational psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Pre-deployment predictors of suicide attempt during and after combat deployment: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.Journal of psychiatric research · 2020Article
- The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): progress toward understanding suicide among soldiers.Molecular psychiatry · 2019Review
- Risk Factors Associated With Attempted Suicide Among US Army Soldiers Without a History of Mental Health Diagnosis.JAMA psychiatry · 2018Article
- Improving risk prediction accuracy for new soldiers in the U.S. Army by adding self-report survey data to administrative data.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Risk factors for concurrent suicidal ideation and violent impulses in military veterans.Psychological assessment · 2018Article
- Genetic and Psychosocial Predictors of Aggression: Variable Selection and Model Building With Component-Wise Gradient Boosting.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Offending behaviour, health and wellbeing of military veterans in the criminal justice system.PloS one · 2018Article
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Aggression, Impulsivity, and History of Other- and Self-Directed Aggression.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2018Article
- Predicting Sexual Assault Perpetration in the U.S. Army Using Administrative Data.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Association between baseline psychological attributes and mental health outcomes after soldiers returned from deployment.BMC psychology · 2017Article
- Using self-report surveys at the beginning of service to develop multi-outcome risk models for new soldiers in the U.S. Army.Psychological medicine · 2017Article
- Using administrative data to identify U.S. Army soldiers at high-risk of perpetrating minor violent crimes.Journal of psychiatric research · 2017Article
- Extremism, religion and psychiatric morbidity in a population-based sample of young men.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016Article
- Developing a Risk Model to Target High-risk Preventive Interventions for Sexual Assault Victimization among Female U.S. Army Soldiers.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2016Article
- [Interpersonal violence in the context of affective and psychotic disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough interventions exist to reduce violent crime, optimal implementation requires accurate targeting. We report the results of an attempt to develop an actuarial model using machine learning methods to predict future violent crimes among US Army soldiers.
methodA consolidated administrative database for all 975 057 soldiers in the US Army in 2004-2009 was created in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). Of these soldiers, 5771 committed a first founded major physical violent crime (murder-manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated arson, aggravated assault, robbery) over that time period. Temporally prior administrative records measuring socio-demographic, Army career, criminal justice, medical/pharmacy, and contextual variables were used to build an actuarial model for these crimes separately among men and women using machine learning methods (cross-validated stepwise regression, random forests, penalized regressions). The model was then validated in an independent 2011-2013 sample.
resultsKey predictors were indicators of disadvantaged social/socioeconomic status, early career stage, prior crime, and mental disorder treatment. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.80-0.82 in 2004-2009 and 0.77 in the 2011-2013 validation sample. Of all administratively recorded crimes, 36.2-33.1% (male-female) were committed by the 5% of soldiers having the highest predicted risk in 2004-2009 and an even higher proportion (50.5%) in the 2011-2013 validation sample.
conclusionsAlthough these results suggest that the models could be used to target soldiers at high risk of violent crime perpetration for preventive interventions, final implementation decisions would require further validation and weighing of predicted effectiveness against intervention costs and competing risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.