Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26436603›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2016

Predicting non-familial major physical violent crime perpetration in the US Army from administrative data.

A J Rosellini, J Monahan, A E Street, S G Heeringa, E D Hill, M Petukhova, B Y Reis, N A Sampson, P Bliese, M Schoenbaum and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extremism, religion and psychiatric morbidity in a population-based sample of young men.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016
    Article
  15. Developing a Risk Model to Target High-risk Preventive Interventions for Sexual Assault Victimization among Female U.S. Army Soldiers.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

A J RoselliniDepartment of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
J MonahanSchool of Law,University of Virginia,Charlottesville,VA,USA.
A E StreetNational Center for PTSD,VA Boston Healthcare System,Boston,MA,USA.
S G HeeringaInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USA.
E D HillDepartment of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
M PetukhovaDepartment of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
B Y ReisPredictive Medicine Group,Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
N A SampsonDepartment of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
P BlieseDarla Moore School of Business,University of South Carolina,Columbia,South Carolina,USA.
M SchoenbaumOffice of Science Policy, Planning and Communications,National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda,MD,USA.
M B SteinDepartments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine & Public Health,University of California San Diego,La Jolla,CA,USA.
R J UrsanoDepartment of Psychiatry,Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress,Uniformed Services University School of Medicine,Bethesda,MD,USA.
R C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
Harvard University · USNational Center for PTSD · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Modifiable Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Behaviors in the US ArmyU01MH087981 · NIMH · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI STEIN, MURRAY B., URSANO, ROBERT J. · 2009 to 2013
$65.0M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH087981NIMH NIH HHS U01MH087981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough interventions exist to reduce violent crime, optimal implementation requires accurate targeting. We report the results of an attempt to develop an actuarial model using machine learning methods to predict future violent crimes among US Army soldiers.

methodA consolidated administrative database for all 975 057 soldiers in the US Army in 2004-2009 was created in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). Of these soldiers, 5771 committed a first founded major physical violent crime (murder-manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated arson, aggravated assault, robbery) over that time period. Temporally prior administrative records measuring socio-demographic, Army career, criminal justice, medical/pharmacy, and contextual variables were used to build an actuarial model for these crimes separately among men and women using machine learning methods (cross-validated stepwise regression, random forests, penalized regressions). The model was then validated in an independent 2011-2013 sample.

resultsKey predictors were indicators of disadvantaged social/socioeconomic status, early career stage, prior crime, and mental disorder treatment. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.80-0.82 in 2004-2009 and 0.77 in the 2011-2013 validation sample. Of all administratively recorded crimes, 36.2-33.1% (male-female) were committed by the 5% of soldiers having the highest predicted risk in 2004-2009 and an even higher proportion (50.5%) in the 2011-2013 validation sample.

conclusionsAlthough these results suggest that the models could be used to target soldiers at high risk of violent crime perpetration for preventive interventions, final implementation decisions would require further validation and weighing of predicted effectiveness against intervention costs and competing risks.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdolescentAdultAge FactorsArea Under CurveCrimeFemaleFiresetting BehaviorHomicideHumansMachine LearningMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelOdds RatioActuarial modelcrime perpetrationmachine learningmilitary violencephysical violencerisk model

Identifiers

PMID26436603
PMCPMC5111361
OpenAlexW1847033250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.