Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26436105›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2015

Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing assay for the clinical genetic screening of CFTR.

Daniel Trujillano, Maximilian E R Weiss, Julia Köster, Efstathios B Papachristos, Martin Werber, Krishna Kumar Kandaswamy, Anett Marais, Sabrina Eichler, Jenny Creed, Erol Baysal and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel TrujillanoCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Maximilian E R WeissCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Julia KösterCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Efstathios B PapachristosCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Martin WerberCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Krishna Kumar KandaswamyCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Anett MaraisCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Sabrina EichlerCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Jenny CreedCentogene AG Rostock, Germany.
Erol BaysalPathology and Genetics Department, Dubai Genetic and Thalassemia Center, Dubai Health Authority Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Iqbal Yousuf JaberPathology and Genetics Department, Dubai Genetic and Thalassemia Center, Dubai Health Authority Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Dina Ahmed MehaneyClinical and Chemical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University Cairo, Egypt.
Chantal FarraDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut, Lebanon.
Arndt RolfsCentogene AG Rostock, Germany ; Albrecht-Kossel-Institute for Neuroregeneration, Medical University Rostock Rostock, Germany.
Centogene (Germany) · DEDubai Health Authority · AEAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LBCairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing for cystic fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders mostly relies on laborious molecular tools that use Sanger sequencing to scan for mutations in the CFTR gene. We have explored a more efficient genetic screening strategy based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the CFTR gene. We validated this approach in a cohort of 177 patients with previously known CFTR mutations and polymorphisms. Genomic DNA was amplified using the Ion AmpliSeq™ CFTR panel. The DNA libraries were pooled, barcoded, and sequenced using an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer. The combination of different robust bioinformatics tools allowed us to detect previously known pathogenic mutations and polymorphisms in the 177 samples, without detecting spurious pathogenic calls. In summary, the assay achieves a sensitivity of 94.45% (95% CI: 92% to 96.9%), with a specificity of detecting nonvariant sites from the CFTR reference sequence of 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 100% to 100%), and a negative predictive value of 99.99% (95% CI: 99.99% to 100%). In addition, we describe the observed allelic frequencies of 94 unique definitely and likely pathogenic, uncertain, and neutral CFTR variants, some of them not previously annotated in the public databases. Strikingly, a seven exon spanning deletion as well as several more technically challenging variants such as pathogenic poly-thymidine-guanine and poly-thymidine (poly-TG-T) tracts were also detected. Targeted NGS is ready to substitute classical molecular methods to perform genetic testing on the CFTR gene.

Indexed as

CFTRcystic fibrosisIon Torrentmolecular diagnosticsnext-generation sequencingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID26436105
PMCPMC4585447
OpenAlexW1969779465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.