Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435977›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Evaluation of Choroidal Thickness and Volume during the Third Trimester of Pregnancy using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography: A Pilot Study.

Renata T Rothwell, Dália M Meira, Marisa A Oliveira, Lígia F Ribeiro, Sofia L Fonseca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of the Choroid in Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancy.Translational vision science & technology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative analysis of choroidal thickness in third trimester pregnant women.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renata T RothwellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho , Portugal .
Dália M MeiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho , Portugal .
Marisa A OliveiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho , Portugal .
Lígia F RibeiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho , Portugal .
Sofia L FonsecaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho , Portugal .
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring pregnancy the maternal choroid is exposed to the multiple haemodynamic and hormonal alterations inherent to this physiological condition. These changes may influence choroidal anatomy. In this study a quantitative assessment of overall choroidal structure is performed, by constructing a 3-dimensional topographic map of this vascular bed. PURPOSE: To compare the thickness and volume of the maternal choroidal in the third trimester of pregnancy with that of an age-matched control group of women. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-four eyes of 12 pregnant women in the last trimester and 12 age-matched healthy controls (24 eyes) were included. Optical coherence tomography in enhanced depth imaging mode was used to construct maps of the choroid of the macular area. Choroidal thickness and volume were automatically calculated for the 9 subfields defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). A comparative analysis between the two groups was performed using the two-way ANOVA test.

resultsThe average thickness of the choroid for the entire ETDRS area of the pregnant group was 295.15 ±42.40μm and 271.56 ±37.65μm in the control group (p=0.051). The average choroidal volume was 8.05 ±1.12mm(3) and 7.46 ±1.03mm(3), respectively (p=0.067). Although the choroid of the pregnant group had larger thickness and volume in all subfields compared to the control group, this difference was statistically significant only in three regions - the central subfield, minimum foveal thickness and inferior inner macula (p<0.05).

conclusionOur study suggests that in the third trimester of pregnancy the choroid may be subjected to physiological changes in structure. Whether these changes are a result of hormonal and/or haemodynamic adaptations of pregnancy remains to be studied.

Indexed as

ChoroidChoroidal volumeOCT

Identifiers

PMID26435977
PMCPMC4576570
OpenAlexW2413348184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.