Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435944›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Evaluation of Ica Gene in Comparison with Phenotypic Methods for Detection of Biofilm Production by Coagulase Negative Staphylococci in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

P Thilakavathy, R M Vasantha Priyan, P A T Jagatheeswari, Jhansi Charles, V Dhanalakshmi, S Lallitha, T Rajendran, B Divya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Biofilm Formation and Presence ofOsong public health and research perspectives · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P ThilakavathyAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute , Tamilnadu, India .
R M Vasantha PriyanAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Madurai Medical College , Tamilnadu, India .
P A T JagatheeswariProfessor and HOD, Department of Microbiology, Madurai Medical College , Tamilnadu, India .
Jhansi CharlesRegistrar, TN DR.MGR Medical University , Chennai, Tamilnadu, India .
V DhanalakshmiProfessor, Department of Microbiology, Madurai Medical College , Tamilnadu, India .
S LallithaAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Theni Medical College , Tamilnadu, India .
T RajendranAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute , Tamilnadu, India .
B DivyaAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Mohan kumaramangalam Medical College , Salem, Tamilnadu, India .
Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofilm producing bacteria are responsible for several chronic infections and are difficult to treat as they show much greater resistance to antibiotics. The major virulence factor determining the pathogenicity of CoNS has now well defined and found to be biofilm production.

objectiveThe study was conducted to isolate and characterize Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and their ability to form biofilms was evaluated by phenotypic and genotypic methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 96 clinical isolates of CoNS were characterized and subjected to biofilm detection by tissue culture plate method (TCP), tube method (TM), congo red agar method (CRA) and PCR.

resultsStaphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly isolated species 76(79.17%). The ica gene was present in 35 (36.45%) of CoNS isolates which were detected as biofilm producers by TCP. Biofilm producing isolates showed higher antibiotic resistance(72.1%). Majority of biofilm producers had strong association with medical device related infections.

conclusionTo compare PCR based dectection method for presence of ica genes with TCP, the test share the specific identification rates. The sensitivity and specificity of TCP method in detection of biofilm was high in comparison with TM and CRA. TCP can be recommended as a general screening test for biofilm detection.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceCongo red agar methodTissue culture plate methodTube method

Identifiers

PMID26435944
PMCPMC4576535
OpenAlexW1777567470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.