Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435917›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2015

Total gadolinium tissue deposition and skin structural findings following the administration of structurally different gadolinium chelates in healthy and ovariectomized female rats.

Yì-Xiáng J Wáng, Joseph Schroeder, Heiko Siegmund, Jean-Marc Idée, Nathalie Fretellier, Gaëlle Jestin-Mayer, Cecile Factor, Min Deng, Wei Kang, Sameh K Morcos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gadolinium distribution in kidney tissue determined and quantified by micro synchrotron X-ray fluorescence.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Effects of gadolinium-based contrast agents on submandibular gland tissue in rats.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Gadolinium-based contrast agent toxicity: a review of known and proposed mechanisms.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yì-Xiáng J Wáng1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Joseph Schroeder1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Heiko Siegmund1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jean-Marc Idée1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nathalie Fretellier1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Gaëlle Jestin-Mayer1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Cecile Factor1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Min Deng1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Wei Kang1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sameh K Morcos1 Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 2 Central EM Laboratory, Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Regensburg, The University of Regensburg, Germany ; 3 Guerbet, Research and Innovation Division, BP 57400, 95943 Roissy-Charles de Gaulle cedex, France ; 4 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China ; 5 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the retention of gadolinium (Gd) in skin, liver, and bone following gadodiamide or gadoteric acid administration.

methodsGd was measured in skin, liver and femur bone in female rats 10 weeks after administration of 17.5 mmol Gd/kg over 5 days of Gd agents. Rat skin microscopy, energy filtering transmission electron microscopy and elemental analysis were performed, and repeated after receiving the same dosage of gadodiamide in rats with osteoporosis induced with bilateral ovariectomy (OVX). The OVX was performed 60 days after the last injection of gadodiamide and animals sacrificed 3 weeks later.

resultsGd concentration was 180-fold higher in the skin, 25-fold higher in the femur, and 30-fold higher in the liver in rats received gadodiamide than rats received gadoteric acid. The retention of Gd in the skin with gadodiamide was associated with an increase in dermal cellularity, and Gd encrustation of collagen fibers and deposition inside the fibroblasts and other cells. No differences in Gd concentration in liver, skin, and femur were observed between rats receiving gadodiamide with or without OVX.

conclusionsGd tissue retention with gadodiamide was higher than gadoteric acid. Tissues Gd deposition did not alter following gadodiamide administration to ovariectomized rats.

Indexed as

bone depositionGadolinium (Gd)osteoporosisskinultrastructural

Identifiers

PMID26435917
PMCPMC4559982
OpenAlexW1864599143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.