Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435913›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2015

The effect of changes to MOLLI scheme on T1 mapping and extra cellular volume calculation in healthy volunteers with 3 tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Adam K McDiarmid, David A Broadbent, David M Higgins, Peter P Swoboda, Ananth Kidambi, David P Ripley, Bara Erhayiem, Tarique A Musa, Laura E Dobson, John P Greenwood and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Free-Breathing Ungated Radial Simultaneous Multi-Slice Cardiac T1 Mapping.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Native myocardial TRadiological physics and technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 3D myocardial TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2017
    Article
  18. Effect of cellular and extracellular pathology assessed by T1 mapping on regional contractile function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adam K McDiarmid1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
David A Broadbent1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
David M Higgins1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
Peter P Swoboda1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
Ananth Kidambi1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
David P Ripley1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
Bara Erhayiem1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
Tarique A Musa1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
Laura E Dobson1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
John P Greenwood1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.
Sven Plein1 Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) & Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; 2 Philips Healthcare, Philips Centre, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/14/10/30641Department of Health DRF-2012-05-155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with magnetic resonance (MR) by calculating extracellular volume (ECV) fraction from native and post-contrast T1 values. The ideal modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence for deriving T1 values has not been determined. This study aims to establish if systematic differences exist between suggested MOLLI schemes.

methodsTwelve phantom gels were studied with inversion recovery spin echo MR at 3.0 tesla to determine reference T1. Gels were then scanned with six MOLLI sequences (3s)3b(3s)5b; 4b(3s)3b(3s)2b; 5b(3s)3b with flip angles of both 35° and 50° at a range of heart rates (HRs). In 10 healthy volunteers MOLLI studies were performed on two separate occasions. Mid ventricular native and post contrast T1 was measured and ECV (%) calculated.

resultsIn phantoms, the co-efficient of variability at simulated HR [40-100] with a flip angle of 35° ranged from 6.77 to 9.55, and at 50° from 7.71 to 11.10. T1 was under-estimated by all MOLLI acquisitions. Error was greatest with longer T1, and increased as HR increased. The 10 volunteers had normal MR studies. Native T1 time was similar for all acquisitions but highest with the 5b(3s)3b 35° scheme (1,189.1±33.46 ms). Interstudy reproducibility was similar for all MOLLIs.

conclusionsThe 5b(3s)3b MOLLI scheme agreed best with reference T1, without statistical difference between the six schemes. The shorter breath-hold time of 5b(3s)3b scheme may be preferable in clinical studies and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI)T1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID26435913
PMCPMC4559984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.