Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435885›Full record

ArticleWorm

Proteomic identification of germline proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans.

B Elizabeth Turner, Sophia M Basecke, Grace C Bazan, Eric S Dodge, Cassy M Haire, Dylan J Heussman, Chelsey L Johnson, Chelsea K Mukai, Adrianna M Naccarati, Sunny-June Norton and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Worm. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B Elizabeth TurnerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA ; ; Department of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Sophia M BaseckeDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Grace C BazanDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Eric S DodgeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA ;
Cassy M HaireDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Dylan J HeussmanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA ;
Chelsey L JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Chelsea K MukaiDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Adrianna M NaccaratiDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Sunny-June NortonDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Jennifer R SatoDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Chihara O TalaveraDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA ;
Michael V WadeDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
Kenneth J HillersDepartment of Biological Sciences; California Polytechnic State University ; San Luis Obispo, CA USA.
California Polytechnic State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual reproduction involves fusion of 2 haploid gametes to form diploid offspring with genetic contributions from both parents. Gamete formation represents a unique developmental program involving the action of numerous germline-specific proteins. In an attempt to identify novel proteins involved in reproduction and embryonic development, we have carried out a proteomic characterization of the process in Caenorhabditis elegans. To identify candidate proteins, we used 2D gel electrophoresis (2DGE) to compare protein abundance in nucleus-enriched extracts from wild-type C. elegans, and in extracts from mutant worms with greatly reduced gonads (glp-4(bn2) worms reared at 25°C); 84 proteins whose abundance correlated with germline presence were identified. To validate candidates, we used feeding RNAi to deplete candidate proteins, and looked for reduction in fertility and/or germline cytological defects. Of 20 candidates so screened for involvement in fertility, depletion of 13 (65%) caused a significant reduction in fertility, and 6 (30%) resulted in sterility (<5 % of wild-type fertility). Five of the 13 proteins with demonstrated roles in fertility have not previously been implicated in germline function. The high frequency of defects observed after RNAi depletion of candidate proteins suggests that this approach is effective at identifying germline proteins, thus contributing to our understanding of this complex organ.

Indexed as

2D gel electrophoresiscomparative proteomicsfertilitygametogenesismeiosisRNA interference

Identifiers

PMID26435885
PMCPMC4590026
OpenAlexW1926688387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.