Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435851›Full record

ArticleAdvances in preventive medicine2015

Novel Longitudinal and Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Hands-On Cooking and Nutrition Education versus Traditional Clinical Education among 627 Medical Students.

Dominique J Monlezun, Benjamin Leong, Esther Joo, Andrew G Birkhead, Leah Sarris, Timothy S Harlan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03443635 (Cooking for Health Optimization With Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03443635 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Cooking for Health Optimization With Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorTulane UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled7,192ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Nutrition Disorders, DiabetesArmsTreatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact and evaluation of an online culinary nutrition course for health, education and industry professionals to promote vegetable knowledge and consumption.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominique J MonlezunThe Goldring Center for Culinary Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA ; Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Benjamin LeongLong Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, CA 90806, USA.
Esther JooThe Goldring Center for Culinary Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA ; Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Andrew G BirkheadThe Goldring Center for Culinary Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA ; University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Leah SarrisThe Goldring Center for Culinary Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA.
Timothy S HarlanThe Goldring Center for Culinary Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Physicians are inadequately equipped to respond to the global obesity and nutrition-associated chronic disease epidemics. We investigated superiority of simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice (SBME-DP) hands-on cooking and nutrition elective in a medical school-based teaching kitchen versus traditional clinical education for medical students. Materials and Methods. A 59-question panel survey was distributed to an entire medical school twice annually from September 2012 to May 2014. Student diet and attitudes and competencies (DACs) counseling patients on nutrition were compared using conditional multivariate logistic regression, propensity score-weighted, and longitudinal panel analyses. Inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis (IVWM) was used for planned subgroup analysis by year and treatment estimates across the three methods. Results. Of the available 954 students, 65.72% (n = 627) unique students were followed to produce 963 responses. 11.32% (n = 109) of responses were from 84 subjects who participated in the elective. SBME-DP versus traditional education significantly improved fruit and vegetable diet (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07-1.79, p = 0.013) and attitudes (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.40-2.35, p < 0.001) and competencies (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.54-1.92, p < 0.001). Conclusions. This study reports for the first time superiority longitudinally for SBME-DP style nutrition education for medical students which has since expanded to 13 schools.

Identifiers

PMID26435851
PMCPMC4578831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.