Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435847›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Molecular Imaging of Tumors Using a Quantitative T 1 Mapping Technique via Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Kelsey Herrmann, Mette L Johansen, Sonya E Craig, Jason Vincent, Michael Howell, Ying Gao, Lan Lu, Bernadette Erokwu, Richard S Agnes, Zheng-Rong Lu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A fast multislice sequence for 3D MRI-CEST pH imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A PTPmu Biomarker is Associated with Increased Survival in Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsey HerrmannDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Mette L JohansenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Sonya E CraigDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Jason VincentDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Michael HowellDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Ying GaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Lan LuDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Bernadette ErokwuDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Richard S AgnesDepartment of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Zheng-Rong LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Jonathan K PokorskiDepartment of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
James BasilionDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; The National Foundation for Cancer Research (NFCR) Center for Molecular Imaging, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Vikas GulaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Mark GriswoldDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Chris FlaskDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Susann M Brady-KalnayDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA ; Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USNational Foundation for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
(PQC5) Detecting small clusters of tumor cells with a PTPmu probeR01CA179956 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BRADY-KALNAY, SUSANN M · 2013 to 2015
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCI NIH HHS R01 CA179956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with molecular imaging agents would allow for the specific localization of brain tumors. Prior studies using T 1-weighted MR imaging demonstrated that the SBK2-Tris-(Gd-DOTA)3 molecular imaging agent labeled heterotopic xenograft models of brain tumors more intensely than non-specific contrast agents using conventional T 1-weighted imaging techniques. In this study, we used a dynamic quantitative T 1 mapping strategy to more objectively compare intra-tumoral retention of the SBK2-Tris-(Gd-DOTA)3 agent over time in comparison to non-targeted control agents. Our results demonstrate that the targeted SBK2-Tris-(Gd-DOTA)3 agent, a scrambled-Tris-(Gd-DOTA)3 control agent, and the non-specific clinical contrast agent Optimark(™) all enhanced flank tumors of human glioma cells with similar maximal changes on T 1 mapping. However, the retention of the agents differs. The non-specific agents show significant recovery within 20 min by an increase in T 1 while the specific agent SBK2-Tris-(Gd-DOTA)3 is retained in the tumors and shows little recovery over 60 min. The retention effect is demonstrated by percent change in T 1 values and slope calculations as well as by calculations of gadolinium concentration in tumor compared to muscle. Quantitative T 1 mapping demonstrates the superior binding and retention in tumors of the SBK2-Tris-(Gd-DOTA)3 agent over time compared to the non-specific contrast agent currently in clinical use.

Indexed as

cancer imagingmagnetic resonance imagingmolecular imagingprotein tyrosine phosphatasePTPmuT1 relaxation timetumor detection

Identifiers

PMID26435847
PMCPMC4589153
OpenAlexW1539113088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.