ArticleJournal of biological engineering2015
Standards not that standard.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cascading recombinase memory switch for programmable and stable gene expression in Pseudomonas putida.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Genetic engineering of gut commensals: heterologous protein expression inCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Computational tools and data integration to accelerate vaccine development: challenges, opportunities, and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Functional predictability of universal gene circuits in diverse microbial hosts.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- A blueprint for a synthetic genetic feedback optimizer.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Trade-offs between gene expression, growth and phenotypic diversity in microbial populations.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Synthetic microbiology as a source of new enterprises and job creation: a Mediterranean perspective.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- The Synthetic Microbiology Caucus: from abstract ideas to turning microbes into cellular machines and back.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- High-Performance Biocomputing in Synthetic Biology-Integrated Transcriptional and Metabolic Circuits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Experimental Epidemiology of Antibiotic Resistance: Looking for an Appropriate Animal Model System.Microbiology spectrum · 2018Article
- Construction of a Chassis for a Tripartite Protein-Based Molecular Motor.ACS synthetic biology · 2017Article
- Copy number variability of expression plasmids determined by cell sorting and Droplet Digital PCR.Microbial cell factories · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a general assent on the key role of standards in Synthetic Biology. In two consecutive letters to this journal, suggestions on the assembly methods for the Registry of standard biological parts have been described. We fully agree with those authors on the need of a more flexible building strategy and we highlight in the present work two major functional challenges standardization efforts have to deal with: the need of both universal and orthogonal behaviors. We provide experimental data that clearly indicate that such engineering requirements should not be taken for granted in Synthetic Biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.