Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435694›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2015

Structure-Based Analysis of the Ligand-Binding Mechanism for DhelOBP21, a C-minus Odorant Binding Protein, from Dastarcus helophoroides (Fairmaire; Coleoptera: Bothrideridae).

Dong-Zhen Li, Guang-Qiang Yu, Shan-Cheng Yi, Yinan Zhang, De-Xin Kong, Man-Qun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Odorant-Binding Proteins AspiOBP1 and AspiOBP2 inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Structure ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A Salivary Odorant-Binding Protein MediatesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Zhen Li1. Hubei Insect Resources Utilization and Sustainable Pest Management Key Laboratory, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China.
Guang-Qiang Yu2. College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China.
Shan-Cheng Yi1. Hubei Insect Resources Utilization and Sustainable Pest Management Key Laboratory, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China.
Yinan Zhang3. Department of Horticulture, Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, Beijing 102442, PR China.
De-Xin Kong2. College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China.
Man-Qun Wang1. Hubei Insect Resources Utilization and Sustainable Pest Management Key Laboratory, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNBeijing Health Vocational College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odorant binding proteins (OBPs) transport hydrophobic odor molecules across the sensillar lymph to trigger a neuronal response. Herein, the Minus-C OBP (DhelOBP21) was characterized from Dastarcus helophoroides, the most important natural parasitic enemy insect that targets Monochamus alternatus. Homology modeling and molecular docking were conducted on the interaction between DhelOBP21 and 17 volatile molecules (including volatiles from pine bark, the larva of M. alternatus, and the faeces of the larva). The predicted three-dimensional structure showed only two disulfide bridges and a hydrophobic binding cavity with a short C-terminus. Ligand-binding experiments using N-phenylnaphthylamine (1-NPN) as a fluorescent probe showed that DhelOBP21 exhibited better binding affinities against those ligands with a molecular volume between 100 and 125 Å(³) compared with ligands with a molecular volume between 160 and 185 Å(³). Molecules that are too big or too small are not conducive for binding. We mutated the amino acid residues of the binding cavity to increase either hydrophobicity or hydrophilia. Ligand-binding experiments and cyber molecular docking assays indicated that hydrophobic interactions are more significant than hydrogen-bonding interactions. Although hydrogen-bond interactions could be predicted for some binding complexes, the hydrophobic interactions had more influence on binding following hydrophobic changes that affected the cavity. The orientation of ligands affects binding by influencing hydrophobic interactions. The binding process is controlled by multiple factors. This study provides a basis to explore the ligand-binding mechanisms of Minus-C OBP.

Indexed as

AnimalsColeopteraHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPolymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, Odorantodorant-binding proteinReceptors, OdorantDastarcus helophoroides.fluorescence competitive binding assayshydrophobic interactionsmolecular dockingmolecular volumeOdorant-binding proteinssite-directed mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID26435694
PMCPMC4582152
OpenAlexW2402635743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.