Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435675›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health

Accuracy of a new clean-catch technique for diagnosis of urinary tract infection in infants younger than 90 days of age.

María Luisa Herreros, Alfredo Tagarro, Araceli García-Pose, Aida Sánchez, Alfonso Cañete, Pablo Gili

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06265142 (Clean Catch Urine Feasibility and Contamination Rate Compared to Bladder Catheterization Urine in Pre-Continent Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06265142 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clean Catch Urine Feasibility and Contamination Rate Compared to Bladder Catheterization Urine in Pre-Continent Children: Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOman Medical Speciality BoardRan2024 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsUrinary Tract InfectionsArmsBladder catheterization, clean catch urine via bladder massage technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Reducing infant catheterization in the emergency department through clean-catch urine collection.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María Luisa HerrerosPediatrics Department, Infanta Sofia University Hospital, San Sebastián de Los Reyes; ; Health Sciences Faculty, European University, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
Alfredo TagarroPediatrics Department, Infanta Sofia University Hospital, San Sebastián de Los Reyes; ; Health Sciences Faculty, European University, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
Araceli García-PosePediatrics Department, Infanta Sofia University Hospital, San Sebastián de Los Reyes;
Aida SánchezMicrobiology Department, Infanta Sofía University Hospital, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso CañetePediatrics Department, Infanta Sofia University Hospital, San Sebastián de Los Reyes; ; Health Sciences Faculty, European University, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo GiliHealth Sciences Faculty, European University, San Sebastián de Los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing urinary tract infections using a new, recently described, standardized clean-catch collection technique.

methodsCross-sectional study of infants <90 days old admitted due to fever without a source, with two matched samples of urine obtained using two different methods: clean-catch standardized stimulation technique and bladder catheterization.

resultsSixty paired urine cultures were obtained. The median age was 44-days-old. Seventeen percent were male infants. Clean-catch technique sensitivity was 97% (95% CI 82% to 100%) and specificity was 89% (95% CI 65% to 98%). The contamination rate of clean-catch samples was lower (5%) than the contamination rate of catheter specimens (8%).

conclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of urine cultures obtained using the clean-catch method through the new technique were accurate and the contamination rate was low. These results suggest that this technique is a valuable, alternative method for urinary tract infection diagnosis.

Indexed as

Bladder stimulationCatheterizationClean-catchUrinary tract infectionsUrine sample

Identifiers

PMID26435675
PMCPMC4578477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.