Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435479›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Rapid targeted somatic mutation analysis of solid tumors in routine clinical diagnostics.

Gilda Magliacane, Greta Grassini, Paola Bartocci, Ilaria Francaviglia, Elena Dal Cin, Gianluca Barbieri, Gianluigi Arrigoni, Lorenza Pecciarini, Claudio Doglioni, Maria Giulia Cangi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Case report:Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Testing for Gastrointestinal Cancer.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gilda MagliacaneUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Greta GrassiniUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Paola BartocciDiatech Pharmacogenetics Company, Jesi, Italy.
Ilaria FrancavigliaUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Elena Dal CinUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Gianluca BarbieriDiatech Pharmacogenetics Company, Jesi, Italy.
Gianluigi ArrigoniUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Lorenza PecciariniUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Claudio DoglioniUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Maria Giulia CangiUnit of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor genotyping is an essential step in routine clinical practice and pathology laboratories face a major challenge in being able to provide rapid, sensitive and updated molecular tests. We developed a novel mass spectrometry multiplexed genotyping platform named PentaPanel to concurrently assess single nucleotide polymorphisms in 56 hotspots of the 5 most clinically relevant cancer genes, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR and PIK3CA for a total of 221 detectable mutations. To both evaluate and validate the PentaPanel performance, we investigated 1025 tumor specimens of 6 different cancer types (carcinomas of colon, lung, breast, pancreas, and biliary tract, and melanomas), systematically addressing sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of our platform. Sanger sequencing was also performed for all the study samples. Our data showed that PentaPanel is a high throughput and robust tool, allowing genotyping for targeted therapy selection of 10 patients in the same run, with a practical turnaround time of 2 working days. Importantly, it was successfully used to interrogate different DNAs isolated from routinely processed specimens (formalin-fixed paraffin embedded, frozen, and cytological samples), covering all the requirements of clinical tests. In conclusion, the PentaPanel platform can provide an immediate, accurate and cost effective multiplex approach for clinically relevant gene mutation analysis in many solid tumors and its utility across many diseases can be particularly relevant in multiple clinical trials, including the new basket trial approach, aiming to identify appropriate targeted drug combination strategies.

Indexed as

Base SequenceClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsGenotyping TechniquesGTP PhosphohydrolasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMembrane ProteinsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMutationNeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)high throughput mass-spectrometrymolecular diagnosticsmutationsPathology Sectionsolid tumorstarget therapy

Identifiers

PMID26435479
PMCPMC4741554
OpenAlexW1757252422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.