Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435386›Full record

Observational studyBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2017

Endometriosis diagnosis and staging by operating surgeon and expert review using multiple diagnostic tools: an inter-rater agreement study.

K C Schliep, Z Chen, J B Stanford, Y Xie, S L Mumford, A O Hammoud, E Boiman Johnstone, J K Dorais, M W Varner, G M Buck Louis and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Hallmarks of Endometriosis.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024
    Article
  8. The Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Modifiable life style factors and risk for incident endometriosis.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K C SchliepDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Z ChenDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
J B StanfordDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Y XieDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
S L MumfordDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
A O HammoudDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
E Boiman JohnstoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J K DoraisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
M W VarnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
G M Buck LouisDivision of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
C M PetersonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
University of Utah · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

ENDO Study: Endometriosis, Natural History and DiagnosisZIAHD008829 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI CHEN, ZHEN · 2009 to 2021
$741k
NICHD NIH HHS N01 DK063427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine agreement on endometriosis diagnosis between real-time laparoscopy and subsequent expert review of digital images, operative reports, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and histopathology, viewed sequentially.

designInter-rater agreement study.

settingFive urban surgical centres. POPULATION: Women, aged 18-44 years, who underwent a laparoscopy regardless of clinical indication. A random sample of 105 women with and 43 women without a postoperative endometriosis diagnosis was obtained from the ENDO study.

methodsLaparoscopies were diagnosed, digitally recorded, and reassessed.

main outcome measuresInter-observer agreement of endometriosis diagnosis and staging according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine criteria. Prevalence and bias-adjusted kappa values (κ) were calculated for diagnosis, and weighted κ values were calculated for staging.

resultsSurgeons and expert reviewers had substantial agreement on diagnosis and staging after viewing digital images (n = 148; mean κ = 0.67, range 0.61-0.69; mean κ = 0.64, range 0.53-0.78, respectively) and after additionally viewing operative reports (n = 148; mean κ = 0.88, range 0.85-0.89; mean κ = 0.85, range 0.84-0.86, respectively). Although additionally viewing MRI findings (n = 36) did not greatly impact agreement, agreement substantially decreased after viewing histological findings (n = 67), with expert reviewers changing their assessment from a positive to a negative diagnosis in up to 20% of cases.

conclusionAlthough these findings suggest that misclassification bias in the diagnosis or staging of endometriosis via visualised disease is minimal, they should alert gynaecologists who review operative images in order to make decisions on endometriosis treatment that operative reports/drawings and histopathology, but not necessarily MRI, will improve their ability to make sound judgments. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Endometriosis diagnosis and staging agreement between expert reviewers and operating surgeons was substantial.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultEndometriosisFemaleHumansLaparoscopyObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultEndometriosisepidemiologyhistologylaparoscopymagnetic resonance imagingreliability

Identifiers

PMID26435386
PMCPMC4821828
OpenAlexW1910949098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.