Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26435289›Full record

ReviewReviews on recent clinical trials2015

PLCO: Evolution of an Epidemiologic Resource and Opportunities for Future Studies.

Amanda Black, Wen-Yi Huang, Patrick Wright, Tom Riley, Jerome Mabie, Sunitha Mathew, Lawrence Ragard, Sigurd Hermansen, Kelly Yu, Paul Pinsky and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews on recent clinical trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amanda BlackDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, USA. blacka@mail.nih.gov.
Wen-Yi Huang
Patrick Wright
Tom Riley
Jerome Mabie
Sunitha Mathew
Lawrence Ragard
Sigurd Hermansen
Kelly Yu
Paul Pinsky
Philip C Prorok
Neal D Freedman
Robert N Hoover

Funding

PLCO EEMS and Extended Follow UpZIACP010207 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MOORE, STEVEN · 2010 to 2025
$11.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), a large-scale, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial, was launched in 1992 to evaluate the effectiveness of screening modalities for prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer. However, PLCO was additionally designed to serve as an epidemiologic resource and the National Cancer Institute has invested substantial resources over the years to accomplish this goal. In this report, we provide a summary of changes to PLCO's follow-up after conclusion of the screening phase of the trial and highlight recent data and biospecimen collections, including ancillary studies, geocoding, administration of a new medication use questionnaire, consent for linkage to Medicare, and additional tissue collection that enhance the richness of the PLCO resource and provide further opportunities for scientific investigation into the prevention, early detection, etiology and treatment of cancer.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleForecastingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMulticenter Studies as TopicNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Support as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26435289
PMCPMC6444921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.