Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26434720›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Kai Zeng, Pádraic Corcoran

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomics of plant speciation.Plant communications · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai ZengDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom k.zeng@sheffield.ac.uk.
Pádraic CorcoranDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K000209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that most new mutations that affect fitness exert deleterious effects and that natural populations are often composed of subpopulations (demes) connected by gene flow. To gain a better understanding of the joint effects of purifying selection and population structure, we focus on a scenario where an ancestral population splits into multiple demes and study neutral diversity patterns in regions linked to selected sites. In the background selection regime of strong selection, we first derive analytic equations for pairwise coalescent times and FST as a function of time after the ancestral population splits into two demes and then construct a flexible coalescent simulator that can generate samples under complex models such as those involving multiple demes or nonconservative migration. We have carried out extensive forward simulations to show that the new methods can accurately predict diversity patterns both in the nonequilibrium phase following the split of the ancestral population and in the equilibrium between mutation, migration, drift, and selection. In the interference selection regime of many tightly linked selected sites, forward simulations provide evidence that neutral diversity patterns obtained from both the nonequilibrium and equilibrium phases may be virtually indistinguishable for models that have identical variance in fitness, but are nonetheless different with respect to the number of selected sites and the strength of purifying selection. This equivalence in neutral diversity patterns suggests that data collected from subdivided populations may have limited power for differentiating among the selective pressures to which closely linked selected sites are subject.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansPopulation Dynamicsbackground selectioncoalescentFSTinterference selectionpopulation subdivision

Identifiers

PMID26434720
PMCPMC4676517
OpenAlexW2117638220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.