ArticleNorthwest dentistry
Differential Diagnoses for Persistent Pain Following Root Canal Treatment: A Study in the National Dental PBRN.
Article in Northwest dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Reprint of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain present six months following root canal treatment (RCT) may be either of odontogenic or non-odontogenic origin. This is important because treatments and prognoses are different; therefore, the aim of this study was to provide specific diagnoses of patients reporting pain six months after receiving initial orthograde RCT.
methodsWe enrolled patients from the Midwest region of an existing prospective observational study of pain after RCT. Pain at six months was defined as ≥ 1 day of pain and average pain intensity of at least 1/10 over the preceding month. An endodontist and an orofacial pain practitioner independently performed clinical evaluations, which included periapical and cone-beam computed tomograph (CT) radiographs, to determine diagnoses.
resultsThirty-eight out of the 354 eligible patients in the geographic area (11%) met the pain criteria, with 19 (50%) consenting to be clinically evaluated. As the sole reason for pain, 7 patients (37%) were given odontogenic diagnoses (4 involving the RCT tooth, 3 involving an adjacent tooth). Eight patients (42%) were given non-odontogenic pain diagnoses (7 from referred temporomandibular disorder [TMD] pain, 1 from persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder [PDAP]). Two patients (11%) had both odontogenic and non-odontogenic diagnoses, while 2 (11%) no longer fit the pain criteria at the time of the clinical evaluation.
conclusionPatients reporting "tooth" pain 6 months following RCT had a non-odontogenic pain diagnosis accounting for some of this pain, with TMD being the most frequent non-odontogenic diagnosis. Dentists should have the necessary knowledge to differentiate between these diagnoses to adequately manage their patients.
Identifiers
26433993W2993782555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.