Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433922›Full record

ReviewVaccine2015

Enhancing vaccine safety capacity globally: A lifecycle perspective.

Robert T Chen, Tom T Shimabukuro, David B Martin, Patrick L F Zuber, Daniel M Weibel, Miriam Sturkenboom

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Traceable Vaccine Supply Management System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert T ChenOffice of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: bchen@cdc.gov.
Tom T ShimabukuroOffice of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
David B MartinOffice of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Patrick L F ZuberWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel M WeibelErasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Miriam SturkenboomErasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major vaccine safety controversies have arisen in several countries beginning in the last decades of 20th century. Such periodic vaccine safety controversies are unlikely to go away in the near future as more national immunization programs mature with near elimination of target vaccine-preventable diseases that result in relative greater prominence of adverse events following immunizations, both true reactions and temporally coincidental events. There are several ways in which vaccine safety capacity can be improved to potentially mitigate the impact of future vaccine safety controversies. This paper aims to take a "lifecycle" approach, examining some potential pre- and post-licensure opportunities to improve vaccine safety, in both developed (specifically U.S. and Europe) and low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug ApprovalEuropeHumansLicensureProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingSafetyUnited StatesVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesAEFICapacity buildingLMICsSustainabilityVaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID26433922
PMCPMC4663114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.