Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016
Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection.
Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01222702 (A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Active Reference, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a 10-day Twice Daily Oral Administration of Three Doses of Cadazolid), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Active Reference, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a 10-day Twice Daily Oral Administration of Three Doses of Cadazolid (ACT-179811) in Subjects With Clostridium Difficile Associated Diarrhea (CDAD)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Novel Antibiotic Cadazolid in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Trial
- Evaluating the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anti-toxigenic effects of postbiotics from lactic acid bacteria onIranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- MRSA compendium of epidemiology, transmission, pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention within one health framework.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Synthesis, Antibacterial Activities, Mode of Action and Acute Toxicity Studies of New Oxazolidinone-Fluoroquinolone Hybrids.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Review
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infections.Emerging microbes & infections · 2018Review
- Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018Review
- Modifications of quinolones and fluoroquinolones: hybrid compounds and dual-action molecules.Monatshefte fur chemie · 2018Review
- Different Resistance Mechanisms for Cadazolid and Linezolid in Clostridium difficile Found by Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- A Review of Experimental and Off-Label Therapies for Clostridium difficile Infection.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2017Review
- Article
- Breakthroughs in the treatment and prevention of Clostridium difficile infection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Review
- Clostridium difficile infection: a review of current and emerging therapies.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile isolates to cadazolid, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of C. difficile infection.
methodsRibotyping and susceptibilities were determined for C. difficile isolates from a multicentre, double-blind, Phase 2 study of oral cadazolid in patients with C. difficile infection (NCT01222702, ClinicalTrials.gov; EudraCT 2010-020941-29, European Clinical Trials Database). Patients were randomized to receive 250, 500 or 1000 mg of cadazolid twice daily or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily, for 10 days. MICs of cadazolid, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, linezolid and moxifloxacin were determined at baseline for all patients and post-baseline for patients with clinical failure or recurrence, using the agar dilution method.
resultsSeventy-eight of 84 patients had an evaluable toxigenic C. difficile isolate at baseline. The most frequent PCR ribotype was 027 (15.4%). Cadazolid MICs for baseline isolates (including epidemic strain 027) ranged from 0.06 to 0.25 mg/L. Baseline cadazolid MICs were similar to those of fidaxomicin and lower than those of vancomycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin. For each clinical outcome group (clinical cure, clinical failure, sustained clinical response and clinical failure or recurrence), the baseline cadazolid MIC range was 0.06-0.25 mg/L. Mean (min-max) cadazolid faecal concentration (μg/g) on day 5 was 884 (101-2710), 1706 (204-4230) and 3226 (1481-12 600) for the doses 250, 500 and 1000 mg, respectively.
conclusionsFor all cadazolid doses, the faecal concentration was in excess of several thousand-fold the MIC90 for C. difficile. The MIC of cadazolid for all C. difficile isolates, including epidemic strains, was low and in the same narrow range regardless of treatment outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.