Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433782›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016

Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection.

D N Gerding, D W Hecht, T Louie, C E Nord, G H Talbot, O A Cornely, M Buitrago, E Best, S Sambol, J R Osmolski and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01222702 (A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Active Reference, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a 10-day Twice Daily Oral Administration of Three Doses of Cadazolid), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01222702 phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Active Reference, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a 10-day Twice Daily Oral Administration of Three Doses of Cadazolid (ACT-179811) in Subjects With Clostridium Difficile Associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorActelionRan2011 to 2012Enrolled84ConditionsClostridium Difficile InfectionArmsCadazolid, Vancomycin, Placebo-matching cadazolid, Placebo-matching vancomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

D N GerdingLoyola University, Maywood, IL, USA Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA dale.gerding2@va.gov.
D W HechtLoyola University, Maywood, IL, USA Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
T LouieUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
C E NordKarolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
G H TalbotTalbot Advisors, Anna Maria, FL, USA.
O A CornelyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
M BuitragoIdaho Falls Infectious Diseases, Idaho Falls, ID, USA.
E BestLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
S SambolLoyola University, Maywood, IL, USA Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
J R OsmolskiLoyola University, Maywood, IL, USA Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
H KrackerActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
H H LocherActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
P CharefActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
M WilcoxLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Actelion (Switzerland) · CHLoyola University Chicago · USLeeds General Infirmary · GBCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases · DEEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USHealthcentric Advisors · USKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile isolates to cadazolid, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of C. difficile infection.

methodsRibotyping and susceptibilities were determined for C. difficile isolates from a multicentre, double-blind, Phase 2 study of oral cadazolid in patients with C. difficile infection (NCT01222702, ClinicalTrials.gov; EudraCT 2010-020941-29, European Clinical Trials Database). Patients were randomized to receive 250, 500 or 1000 mg of cadazolid twice daily or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily, for 10 days. MICs of cadazolid, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, linezolid and moxifloxacin were determined at baseline for all patients and post-baseline for patients with clinical failure or recurrence, using the agar dilution method.

resultsSeventy-eight of 84 patients had an evaluable toxigenic C. difficile isolate at baseline. The most frequent PCR ribotype was 027 (15.4%). Cadazolid MICs for baseline isolates (including epidemic strain 027) ranged from 0.06 to 0.25 mg/L. Baseline cadazolid MICs were similar to those of fidaxomicin and lower than those of vancomycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin. For each clinical outcome group (clinical cure, clinical failure, sustained clinical response and clinical failure or recurrence), the baseline cadazolid MIC range was 0.06-0.25 mg/L. Mean (min-max) cadazolid faecal concentration (μg/g) on day 5 was 884 (101-2710), 1706 (204-4230) and 3226 (1481-12 600) for the doses 250, 500 and 1000 mg, respectively.

conclusionsFor all cadazolid doses, the faecal concentration was in excess of several thousand-fold the MIC90 for C. difficile. The MIC of cadazolid for all C. difficile isolates, including epidemic strains, was low and in the same narrow range regardless of treatment outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedOxazolidinonesRibotypingVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentscadazolidOxazolidinonesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26433782
PMCPMC4681371
OpenAlexW2206706738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.